Sheikh Wasiullah Abbas confirms Mufti Menk is not a Salafi, but Hanafi

11,901

Brother

342

#31 [Permalink] Posted on 19th August 2015 15:01

gatekeeper wrote:

View original post

Let me put it this way.

If people are not listening to Shaykh (Maulana) Tariq Jameel (HA) or Mufti Menk (HA), who are they turning to? Consider the alternatives.

report post quote code quick quote reply

No post ratings

There is no Plan B!

http://www.central-mosque.com/

Unspecified

4,094

Brother

4,060

#32 [Permalink] Posted on 19th August 2015 15:40

gatekeeper wrote:

View original post

That's a very simplistic way of looking at things...I know a brother from the streets whose only connection to the Deen, was Qari Muhammad Hanif Multani (May Allah have mercy upon him), No juma,...no Eid, no Ramazan, every now and then he would feel a void in his heart. So he would pop to the local Islamic bookstore buy a audio cassette , lecture, by Qari Hanif Multani and whenever he felt empty inside he would listen to the cassettes....It took him many years before he made the transition, first juma, the live lectures and then five times Salah.

The ones who cant be bothered to practice the deen have not even reached the gates of the masjid yet, you will find that they once in a while, listen to an audio clip, of Mufti Menk or read his advices on twitter. The seed has been planted, and slowly being watered, Allah knows best when it will bear fruit. What I can say is that if they start listening to the propaganda of the Jealous Zealots, that tiny little connection that they have to the deen, will be lost..."Bro all these Moulvis are deviants, I used to listen to this guy on youtube, but So and So told me his deviant, and this guy he knows his stuff, so if he says the moulvis deviant he must be deviant." The Brothers are slow to invite the guys on the street into the Masjid very quick to tell them who they consider deviant ..."Brother I heard you listening to a lecture on the phone who was you listening too? Oh yeah you need to stay away from him his deviant."

report post quote code quick quote reply

+2 -0Like x 1Informative x 1

Abdur Rahman ibn Awf

Unspecified

Brother

#33 [Permalink] Posted on 20th August 2015 13:27

The posts by uncle muadh and brother abdur rahman make sense. However I still think that when people do not want to stay committed to a life on sunnah they look for excuses.

Lets say someone listens to shaikh tariq jameel sab db and changes his life, he then runs in to refutations of the respected shaikh. This may cause doubts about the shaikh. But why shave your beard and abandon sunnah. That is clear laziness in deen.

We would not let our dunya get destroyed so easily

report post quote code quick quote reply

No post ratings

gatekeeper

11,901

Brother

342

#34 [Permalink] Posted on 20th August 2015 13:31

gatekeeper wrote:

View original post

Deobandees don't acknowledge apostasy at all. Their whole remit is around Taqleed and Tassawuff.

If someone doesn't understand Hazrat its his fault
If someone apostates its his laziness and his fault

While Shaykh (Maulana) Tariq Jameel (HA) & Mufti Menk (HA) & NAK are of a different mindset, i.e. a problem exists lets see what we can do to minimise it.

report post quote code quick quote reply

+2 -0Like x 1Winner x 1

There is no Plan B!

http://www.central-mosque.com/

Unspecified

Brother

#35 [Permalink] Posted on 20th August 2015 13:48

Muadh_Khan wrote:

View original post

I agree with you in your first point. Your second point is correct to a certain extent, also the personalities you mentioned do a great job mashaallah. May Allah subhanahu wa ta'ala increase them in their hilm.
I dont doubt that there are people who abandon deen due to weakness of others. I am sorry my posts do not show that i acknowledge this fact.

My reply was given in response to the dilemma presented by brother abdur rahman. He says someone spends his whole life in jahiliyyah, no one comes to him. He then changes his life and only sees the bickering amongst the ummah. So he decides to go back to his previous lifestyle.
On this occasion i felt that maybe the person.did not like what he heard but eventually just used it as an excuse.

report post quote code quick quote reply

+1 -0Informative x 1

gatekeeper

11,901

Brother

342

#36 [Permalink] Posted on 20th August 2015 13:53

gatekeeper wrote:

View original post

Deobandi analysis:

The problems of every Muslim can be solved in 3 ways:

Make Taqleed of a Madhab (you can follow any Madhab but we of course like you to follow Hanafi Madhab)
When you decide to make Taqleed find a Deobandi Scholar to ask your Mas'alaas
Make Bay't to a Shaykh (you can follow any Shaykh but we of course like you to follow a Deobandi Shaykh)

The world has NO OTHER problems whatsoever :P

report post quote code quick quote reply

+2 -0Winner x 1Creative x 1

There is no Plan B!

http://www.central-mosque.com/

Unspecified

2,891

Brother

279

#37 [Permalink] Posted on 20th August 2015 14:19

gatekeeper wrote:

View original post

Not really sometimes people are just looking for a bit of love and affection and acceptance and why do you think the tableeghis are such a hit with the youth in comparison to the sufi's and the others out there, most will embrace you, smile at you and talk to you and invite you for food, not look down on you because you went to a rave last night with your boys and got hammered. They'll instill hope in you and pray for you, and most people's lives have changed through Tabligh and that's a majority, not saying other methods don't work, just success rates for this is more.

Sadly we love to give fatwa and brand others as deviants whilst excluding our own selves. Reminds me of that clip by Maulana Tariq Jameel 'fatway na do mohabat karo' don't give fatwa give love, maybe someone can post it InshAla if you understand urdu.

report post quote code quick quote reply

+1 -0Like x 1

Jinn

Unspecified

Brother

#38 [Permalink] Posted on 20th August 2015 14:44

Definitely, my opinion is that tabligh in the form of tablighi jamat is vital. Not that there is no other form of dawah out there, but i prefer this way.

Lol i like the deobandi analysis. Remember tablighi jamat is an effort from deoband.
They deal with a lot of the problems not mentioned on your list.

report post quote code quick quote reply

+1 -0Like x 1

gatekeeper

Unspecified

2,891

Brother

279

#39 [Permalink] Posted on 20th August 2015 15:12

gatekeeper wrote:

View original post

You'll see braelvis, salafis, hardcore deobandi's, non deobandi's, followers of other fiqhs in jamaat, all is welcome.

However akhi, a polite reminder for myself first and others, we're going off topic here so let's stick to mufti Menk as this thread is about him

May Allah preserve and elevate him and protect him from the evils of creation. He is doing a great effort for Deen Masha'Ala

report post quote code quick quote reply

+0 -0Ameen x 1

Jinn

11,901

Brother

342

#40 [Permalink] Posted on 3rd July 2017 11:08

Imam Ali wrote:

View original post

Mufti Menk "Hanafi" leading Eid Salah with 12 Takbeers

Halalified YT Audio

Mufti Menk "Hanafi" giving Eid Khutbah in English

Halalified YT Audio

As I said years ago, he doesn’t believe in Taqleed Shaksi.

report post quote code quick quote reply

+2 -0Informative x 2

There is no Plan B!

http://www.central-mosque.com/

Spinistan Throne

1,140

Brother

750

#41 [Permalink] Posted on 3rd July 2017 13:40

In a nutshell brother Muadh, can you tell the layman the implications of doing as he is doing and the dangers it has for his followers. He is a mufti, so he should know what he is doing and when the dangers arise, but what about the millions that follow him. Shouldn't he have any responsibility towards the laypeople?

Shouldn't he set a better example?

report post quote code quick quote reply

No post ratings

Asaaghir

11,901

Brother

342

#42 [Permalink] Posted on 3rd July 2017 14:19

Asaaghir wrote:

View original post

I agree with you after looking at our society and our circumstances.

Doebandi Ulama: Taqleed Shaksi is OBIGATORY on Muslims because if we start picking and choosing then who decides what to pick and what to leave out.
Mufti Menk: Taqleed Shaksi is not obligatory

Both positions have some Academic merits BUT looking at our current situation if we left Taqleed and simply started combining opinions it will wreck our Deen (and it is wrecking our Deen).

Salaf and earlier Muslims were people of Taqwa and practitioners of Sunnah., we are people who have trouble getting up for Fajar! With our Nafs and our slackness towards Sunnah and the position of Deobandi Ulama is safer and sound for Ulama (and laymen) alike.

report post quote code quick quote reply

+1 -0Like x 1Agree x 1

There is no Plan B!

http://www.central-mosque.com/

London

27,560

Brother

9,601

#43 [Permalink] Posted on 3rd July 2017 14:58

I've noticed a great trend recently where laypeople hop on and hop off a school thinking they know it all. Then they mix the opinions of other schools and practice that where it suits them most, then jump back to the original school of thought.

This can be seen in many aspects of the deen.

Why is it dangerous?

Quote:

A famous example given is, that suppose a person performs wudu, and thereafter gets cut on his finger which causes him to bleed.
According to the Hanafi 'Ulama, his wudu is broken, whereas according to the Shafi' 'Ulama his wudu is still intact. In order to avoid making wudu, he takes the Shafi' view on this matter.

This man then touches his wife with desire; according to the Shafi' opinion his wudu is broken, whereas according to the Hanafi school of thought his wudu is still perfect. Seeing that the Hanafi view is easier on this issue, he chooses to follow that school of thought.

He thereafter consumes camel meat which nullifies his wudu according to the Hanbali School. He finds that there is more ease in following the view of those who say that camel meat does not invalidate one's wudu and therefore chooses to follow their view.

Thereafter, he stands up to perform prayers. It is clear that according to the vast majority of Scholars his prayer will not be valid. His worship will be based more on human ego rather than Qur'an and Hadith and his entire deen will be unsystematic. It is precisely for this reason that Mawlana Ashraf 'Ali Thanwi (may Allah Ta'ala be pleased with him) stated, "Our deen is systemized through taqlid." (Ashraf al-Jawab, 161)

Hence, the prohibition of following one's ego is emphatically phobitied in the Qur'an and Hadith. By necessity, it will be prohibited to follow the concession of different scholars. Consider the following verses:

أَرَأَيْتَ مَنِ اتَّخَذَ إِلَهَهُ هَوَاهُ أَفَأَنْتَ تَكُونُ عَلَيْهِ وَكِيلًا

Tell me about the one who has taken his desire as his god, would you then, become a guardian for him?(Al-Furqan 43)

report post quote code quick quote reply

+2 -0Like x 1Winner x 1

Actions are judged by intentions, so each man will have what he intended.
ابو محمد

Unspecified

141

Brother

112

#44 [Permalink] Posted on 3rd July 2017 15:37

Whether taqleed shakshi is wajib or not, in this day and age it is not an issue of opinion.

It is an issue of wisdom.

As the above 2 posts have said, to promote anything other than taqleed shaksi these days, where 99.9% of the people will jump at following the opinion that suits their nafs, is utter foolishness. It is nothing but the systematic destruction of deen.

How many times have we heard excuses like "there is scope for difference", "its a difference of opinion" "Taqleed shakshi is not wajib" used to justify people following their nafs.

It is essentially salafism on steroids. At least the salafis think they are following the quran and sunnah. These "scope for difference" people are simply following their nafs.

I am talking about lay people of course, the issue is more nuanced when it comes to ulema.

Mufti Menk of course generally stays aways from these issues anyway, and I think he is a great daee may the Almighty increase him, even if at times he does not seem to be following the hanafi opinion.

report post quote code quick quote reply

+1 -0Like x 1Ameen x 1

Ryder

Unspecified

1,012

Brother

466

#45 [Permalink] Posted on 3rd July 2017 19:26

Muadh khan

Quote:

:Both positions have some Academic merits BUT looking at our current situation if we left Taqleed and simply started combining opinions it will wreck our Deen (and it is wrecking our Deen).

Salaf and earlier Muslims were people of Taqwa and practitioners of Sunnah., we are people who have trouble getting up for Fajar! With our Nafs and our slackness towards Sunnah and the position of Deobandi Ulama is safer and sound for Ulama (and laymen) alike. [/quote]

That is your opinion, and you are entitled to it, however, many non deobandi ulama , both present day and throughout history, from various backgrounds and madhabs disagree.

Abu Muhammad:

Quote:

Many ulama from various madhabs throughout history until now knew the possible dangers that could arise, and yet they did not enforce taqlid shaksi on all Muslims. So you are entitled to your view, but you cannot insist everyone abides by it.

Secondly, from what you posted, it follows that generally one should not be able to follow different scholars within the madhab as well.

Ryder:
[quote]It is an issue of wisdom.

As the above 2 posts have said, to promote anything other than taqleed shaksi these days, where 99.9% of the people will jump at following the opinion that suits their nafs, is utter foolishness. It is nothing but the systematic destruction of deen.

What a bold claim to make. So many , many ulama of various backgrounds are not wise, are allowing utter foolishness and are systematically destroying the deen. It is clear that even Shah Waliullah did not agree with taqleed shaaksi and the way it is being made necessary for everyone. Purchase " shah Waliullah 's treatises on islamic law" translated by Marcia Hermansen and see for your self.it is translation of two of his works on the topic.

No problem with having your opinion on the issue, but stop ignoring the other valid opinions and insisting that only deobandis are correct , and this goes for many issues.

report post quote code quick quote reply

+1 -0Informative x 1

Concerned

Sheikh Wasiullah Abbas confirms Mufti Menk is not a Salafi, but Hanafi

Font Size

Font Weight

Deobandi analysis: