Forum Menu - Click/Swipe to open
 

Psychology Of Attention Seekers.

You have contributed 40.5% of this topic

Thread Tools
Appreciate
Topic Appreciation
abu mohammed, sipraomer, Asaaghir
Rank Image
Unspecified
913
Brother
390
#16 [Permalink] Posted on 28th December 2019 11:58
sipraomer wrote:
View original post


It is practice, as you mentioned in your post...
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Yasin's avatar
UK
6,700
Brother
944
Yasin's avatar
#17 [Permalink] Posted on 28th December 2019 12:09
sipraomer wrote:
View original post

Step 1: Get rid of, or if not possible then control, or at least recognise anger when it's there.
Step 2: Realise you can't change anyone. No one can. Don't let this fact silent you.

Sabr should be easier now
report post quote code quick quote reply
+2 -0Like x 1
back to top
Rank Image
Muadh_Khan's avatar
Offline
UK
11,901
Brother
342
Muadh_Khan's avatar
#18 [Permalink] Posted on 28th December 2019 15:35

ummi taalib wrote:
View original post


Donald Trump & his Mother

www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/sep/29/trump-on-the-couc...

It all begins with the mother.

This is the opening line of Dr Justin Frank’s book, Trump on the Couch, “a deep dive into the psyche” of the 45th US president which argues that a distant mother and authoritarian father are key to understanding how Donald Trump became Donald Trump: infantile, impulsive and ill-suited for office.

“Yes, we should be scared,” Frank, a clinical professor of psychiatry at George Washington University, told the Guardian. “We have to accept that he is the president and we also have to accept that he’s never going to change because he can’t. Once we accept those things, we can then figure out what to do with our fears.”

For Frank, the dynamic between infant and mother has a profound influence on a person’s psychological outlook and health. Trump’s mother was Mary Anne MacLeod, who arrived in New York from the Outer Hebridean island of Lewis in 1930. After six years as a domestic worker and nanny, she married the property developer Fred Trump and they had five children.

The otherwise garrulous president has said little about his mother. Notably, for his first few months in the Oval Office, the only photo behind his desk was of his father. His mother was added later. Yet, Frank points out, 72-year-old Trump’s gravity-defying hair is a very deliberate homage to his mum’s.

“The fact that he tries to get us to feel his anxiety and he externalises responsibility makes me feel that, as a young child, he did not feel contained or held by his mother or other caretakers,” he says. “He didn’t have a strong maternal force in his life.

“The one thing we do know biographically is that when he was two, the last child in the family was born, but when his mother went to the hospital she didn’t come home right away. She had a haemorrhage, she had four surgeries and came close to dying and there was virtually no talk about that in the family. His older siblings just went to school as if it were normal while they’re terribly worried about their mother.”

His mother’s frequent absences, Frank suggests, left Trump devoid of empathy.

 
report post quote code quick quote reply
+2 -0
back to top
Rank Image
Abdur Rahman ibn Awf's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
4,094
Brother
4,060
Abdur Rahman ibn Awf's avatar
#19 [Permalink] Posted on 28th December 2019 16:38
Then there are those on social media..Instagram, twitter, facebook etc.
. Trying to be controversial and do things of the grid , trolling and tagging others in the hope they will notice and respond.

One can only feel sorry for these types because the ones they are looking towards for approval. Are too busy seeking attention for themselves, to take any notice.

Lots of sad lonely people out there. Desperateley Seeking Attention.

But nobody cares..!
report post quote code quick quote reply
+0 -0Agree x 2Disagree x 1
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
73
Brother
77
#20 [Permalink] Posted on 29th December 2019 01:29
MashaAllah.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
#21 [Permalink] Posted on 29th December 2019 07:24
Abdur Rahman ibn Awf wrote:
View original post


It is childish when poster gets happy if he gets attention on Social media. How does it matter if some one appreciates his/her post or agrees with them or tags winner etc. There are members who know each other from sunniforum days but haven't seen each others photographs, so how does it matter.

Can say it is "bachkana harkath" to react to responses from members on social media forums or blogs.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+0 -0Agree x 1Disagree x 1
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
27,561
Brother
9,601
abu mohammed's avatar
#22 [Permalink] Posted on 29th December 2019 09:14
Guest-49821 wrote:
View original post

No, it is called Dopamine. Search it on the forum.

Then ask yourself honestly what you felt for a nano second when you saw a disagree on your post.

If you didn't feel anything, you have missed the word, "honestly"

It is unfortunate that such micro spasms do affect us one way or the other. What's important is that we don't let it give us joy or grief. But it does happen.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+0 -0Agree x 1
back to top
#23 [Permalink] Posted on 29th December 2019 11:42
Anonymous wrote:
View original post


I give right to someone to disagree with me.

In our whole life we have met people who disagree with us. And it is their right.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
#24 [Permalink] Posted on 29th December 2019 11:51
Once a person met Mujaddid Alf Thani RA and requested for advice.
Hazrath Adviced "My son, never declare yourself god and never make yourself nabi".
The person got shocked, "how can someone get so low"?
Hazrath said "It is Allah who can be "fa'alul lima yureed", Allah does what he wants"

And Nabi is guided by Allah SWT, he is masoom and rightly guided. Ummati can be wrong.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+0 -0
back to top
Rank Image
Muadh_Khan's avatar
Offline
UK
11,901
Brother
342
Muadh_Khan's avatar
#25 [Permalink] Posted on 29th December 2019 15:12

Abdur Rahman ibn Awf wrote:
View original post

Anonymous wrote:
View original post

Because it is the way of the Akabir of Deoband to fight Fitnah at every level, every platform. A (popular) narcissist has the ability to affect people and impact their Eemaan so we will not let the Jaahil alone to spread his/her Fasad. In the process, we will get targetted and slandered but BY ALLAH we will not remain idle if someone is spreading Fitnah & Fasad.

It is the way of the Deobandees to merely worship their Hazrat and ignore everyone else.

report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Abdur Rahman ibn Awf's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
4,094
Brother
4,060
Abdur Rahman ibn Awf's avatar
#26 [Permalink] Posted on 29th December 2019 15:59
Muadh_Khan wrote:
View original post


Depends what platform they are using. On social media they can refuse to engage and block anyone who questions their opinion.

And secondly if they are not really that popular. Then giving them attention will have an opposite of the intended effect. It is better to ignore such individuals who dont havd much of a following and allow their social media presence come to a natural end.

The following article written by Khalid Baig a generation ago is good advice.


"Caution: There is Another anti-Islamic Site There
"

Why issuing an alert letter is precisely the wrong thing to do?

By Khalid Baig
POSTED: 21 RAMADAN 1422, 7 DECEMBER 2001


The alert letters keep coming. Beware here is the latest anti-Islamic site. Then a URL so you can verify that it is indeed as described. Then a passionate request to tell all the Muslims in the world about it.

Sincere. Misguided. Counter-productive.

Little do the senders realize that they are actually helping the very sites they are trying to fight.

The failure is in realizing that the Internet is a very different medium and the rules that applied to the previous media do not always apply here. If there is a bad magazine or book out there, you can tell others about it. We can be sure that nobody will rush to the closest bookseller to buy it. The warning may be useful, if there was a chance that some people could have bought the book out of ignorance.

In the click-click world of the Internet, the first thing most people will do is to click on the URL, thereby increasing the hit counts and boasting the morale of the site owners. Second, it will help it with search engine placement, as some of them will use the increased curiosity traffic as a sign of popularity. You just helped create the monster you wanted to fight!

It is common sense. If you don't want people to visit a site, just don't tell them about it.

It is very easy to setup a page on the Internet. It is very difficult to draw traffic to it. The most anti-Islamic site will die if it faces a frozen counter. That would happen if you just leave it alone. But if you are out there telling everyone about it and asking them to do the same, you are in effect volunteering as their publicity department. That is exactly what they need.

If there is a well-established site (like CNN) it makes sense to launch a protest campaign. But for most of the sites the prudent course is just the opposite. Leave it alone. Let it die of neglect. A natural death. The greater the lack of attention, the faster will be the death of this would be monster.

So the next time you receive an alert letter about an anti-Islamic site, just delete it. If you respond to the sender, do not include the original text of his alert email, because even that may help some search engine ranking.

There were dozens of anti-Islamic sites that sprang up recently but died soon after because, luckily, our enthusiasts had not noticed them and had not publicized them through their alert letters. The ones that receive the alert letter mention will, unfortunately, survive and may thrive.

On the Internet, the best use of your energies is to promote the good Islamic sites. Let the good drive out the evil.

Now, may we request that you send this article to all your friends




report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
MARS
2,170
Brother
361
#27 [Permalink] Posted on 29th December 2019 19:02
Abdur Rahman ibn Awf wrote:
View original post


It is because they haven't discovered their one and only true friend. Allah.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Winner x 1
back to top
Rank Image
Muadh_Khan's avatar
Offline
UK
11,901
Brother
342
Muadh_Khan's avatar
#28 [Permalink] Posted on 29th December 2019 22:01

Abdur Rahman ibn Awf wrote:
View original post

Respectfully disagree.

It is my opinion for decades that people following the Sunnah need to build capabilities which are professional, slick and easy accessible. Social Media is not a vacuum, it is a popularity contest.

You don’t need to go after someone and get blocked, you just need to create delivery points which are popular to attract the right opinion.

If you carefully analyse the pattern of Dawah of prophets in the Qur’aan it is always positive. You keep being positive until the day comes that you have enough of capacity to confront. The confrontation should not be initial.

The cessation of “Deobandees” in America is a case in point, they are rudderless, directionless and have literally no following WHILE others have forged ahead. Since this happened right in lifetime, I have witnessed it and you are watching the results play out in the activist space. You can dismiss “Linda Sarsour” and others but there is no doubt that people like her are able to get eyeballs.
 

report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0
back to top
Rank Image
Abdur Rahman ibn Awf's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
4,094
Brother
4,060
Abdur Rahman ibn Awf's avatar
#29 [Permalink] Posted on 29th December 2019 22:21
Muadh_Khan wrote:
View original post


Okay thats informative.

What approach in your opinion would be more affective.

For example we are in era of hypersexualisation we have muslims behaving badly and partcipating ,and promoting such things, not even thinking of it as sinning.

So to counter something like it.

On social media platforms ,would it be best to address it directly.?

Or would it be better to promote the opposite, that is the benefits of Haya etc.

How does one keep the intention sincere and purely for the sake of Allah...? Social medias seem like a corrupter of intention.

Any advice or links to articles would be appreciated.

report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Muadh_Khan's avatar
Offline
UK
11,901
Brother
342
Muadh_Khan's avatar
#30 [Permalink] Posted on 29th December 2019 22:52

Abdur Rahman ibn Awf wrote:
View original post

The solution is in the post, to be clear in terms of Social media...

Create well run Social Media commentary Accounts (YouTube, Twitter, Facebook) accounts which handle contemporary events so Muslims do not have to resort to those (who are popular) yet farther from the Sunnah.

Instead, "Deobandees" restrict themselves to WhatsApp groups which are joined by like-minded people and Social Media Accouts shy away from contemporary issues.

There are problems in India (right now) so no amount of Ulama not addressing will change the ground reality. Muslims will inevitably seek out people who are talking about these issues and this is where Narcissists come into the picture, google will automatically rank Accounts based on popularity.

I have been saying the same thing for decades but its easier to ban/hate/slander me instead of looking into deep rooted issues with our Institutions. Why are our Institutions not producing quality graduates who guide Muslims on contemoorary issues?
report post quote code quick quote reply
+2 -0
back to top

 

Quick Reply

CAPTCHA - As you are a guest, you are required to answer the following:


In the above image: What is the word in green?