OPINION ABOUT MAUDUDI SAHEB

And I posted Mufti Rafi Usmani (HA) and he clearly says that there is NO SUCH thing as Maslak of Deoband, listen to it but since you won't let me get to the next two points.

1. Maulana Maududi (RA) was a PERSON, Jamaat-e-Islami is a GROUP, do you understand the difference between a person and a group?
   
2. Can you point out the exact minutes where Mufti Zarwali Khan (HA) is saying that the ENTIRE Jamaat-e-Islami has the Hukum as Maulana Maududi (RA), please respond with the minutes and I will translate it in English for everyone.
   

www.youtube.com/watch?v=iMq0_FR5jaA

Rest of your post is just emotional outburst which is no need for response.

For everyone else, Talk is about Maulana Maududi (RA) and Qazi Hussain Ahmed (RA) who was the (Ex) Jamaat-e-Islami who did Mas'ah on (plain) socks. Advice to save your Salah from the Fiqh of Maulana Maududi (RA)....

Can you point out the exact minutes where Mufti Zarwali Khan (HA) is saying that the ENTIRE Jamaat-e-Islami has the Hukum as Maulana Maududi (RA), please respond with the minutes and I will translate it in English for everyone.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=iMq0_FR5jaA

?

No, did not defend him at all.

1. IF there was an error WHAT would be the point of correction? That makes no sense.
2. I am asking you to follow this Hadeeth and leave the matter to Allah Ta'ala. NEVER said for anyone to follow Maulana Maududi (RA) or read his books or follow his teachings at all. NEVER SAID THAT AT ALL!
   

أخبرنا إبراهيم بن يعقوب قال حدثني أحمد بن إسحق قال حدثنا وهيب قال حدثنا منصور بن عبد الرحمن عن أمه عن عائشة قالت ذكر عند النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم هالك بسوء فقال لا تذكروا هلكاكم إلا بخير

Sayyida Aisha (RA) narrates that Something bad was said in the presence of the Prophet (Sallaho Alaihe Wassallam) about a person who had died. He said: 'Do not say anything but good about your dead" [Sunan An-Nasa'i]

Now back to the actual issue.

WHERE are you getting this idea that Maulana Maududi (RA) and Jamaat-e-Islami carry the same Hukm? Mufti Zarwali Khan (HA) says the exact OPPOSITE of what you are claiming.

As I have always said, you have the right to disagree but don’t inflict your misunderstanding on other people. I have never said anything of the sort which you are claiming.

26AUG2015:

This is from over two years ago...

www.muftisays.com/forums/13-articles--stories--more/10369...

Personally, I make dua that Allah gives me death before my mouth or my pen utters what Maulana Maududi (RA) wrote about Amma Ayesha (RA)

Ameen.

BUT that is my personal choice.

Which bit of this post from two years ago did you not understand in plain English?

Nice try but once again not what I am saying at all.

1. There is no need to read the books of Maulana Maududi (RA), read the works of authentic Ulama
2. There is no need to listen to talks of Maulana Maududi (RA), listen to authentic Ulama
3. There is no need to Join Jamaat-e-Islami as they are not doing anything special
4. Jamaat-e-Islami inspired groups in the West are away from the Sunnah so MOST CERTAINLY do not join them
5. Qadiyanees, Hadeeth Rejectors, Herectics etc are Not Muslims so they don't fall into the same category as Maulana Maududi (RA). Even Maulana Ahmed Raza Khan Barelwee (RA) is NOT a Kaafir so not in the same category as Mirza Ghulam Ahmed Qadiyani

And for both Maulana Maududi (RA) and Maulana Ahmed Raza Khan Barelwee (RA) and everybody else in the matter who is similar, I tend to follow this Hadeeth

This DOES NOT mean that you don't point out the errors but we have to follow the Sunnah.

أخبرنا إبراهيم بن يعقوب قال حدثني أحمد بن إسحق قال حدثنا وهيب قال حدثنا منصور بن عبد الرحمن عن أمه عن عائشة قالت ذكر عند النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم هالك بسوء فقال لا تذكروا هلكاكم إلا بخير

Sayyida Aisha (RA) narrates that Something bad was said in the presence of the Prophet (Sallaho Alaihe Wassallam) about a person who had died. He said: 'Do not say anything but good about your dead" [Sunan An-Nasa'i]

Nothing to do with Maulana Maududi (RA) specifically, let the matter of those who have passed away rest with Allah Ta'ala. By all means point out the errors to safeguard people but don't go beyond it.

The day Maulana Saad (HA) or Shaykh Zulfiqar Saheb (HA) , I will switch to what the Sunnah commands me to do. May Allah Ta'ala give them long life (Ameen), I am merely making a point.

This is the decency which our Deen and our Nabi (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) teaches us. 

I WILL point out the errors to save people from misguidance but in a way which does not deviate from the Sunnah and from common decency and manners which any good parents usually teach their children.

Maulana Ahmed Raza Khan Barelwee (RA) and Maulana Maududi (RA)

Live your life as per the Sunnah and be decent human beings, the Salaf never behaved in the manner of brute animals devoid of manners and Sunnah even when refuting dead Muslims.

Speak to people in this manner, “These people have passed away and our Deen does not permit us to disparage the dead. However, to protect the Eemaan of Muslims, it is necessary for me to point out the errors in their writings and their speeches…It is a necessary issue and I hope that balance of not speaking ill about the dead and still highlighting issues is kept by me, Insha’Allah.

Wrong again so let me try again from the beginning.

1. I DO NOT want anyone to read the works of Maulana Maududi (RA), I want them to stick to trustworthy and knowledgeable Ulama.
2. I DO NOT want anyone to listen to talks of Maulana Maududi (RA), I want them to stick to trustworthy and knowledgeable Ulama.
3. I DO NOT want anyone to Join Jamaat-e-Islami (in India or Pakistan or Afghanistan) because I see no benefit in it whatsoever
4. I VERY STRONGLY DISCOURAGE anyone from Joining Jamaat-e-Islami or Maulana Maududi (RA) inspired Jamaats in the West e.g. MSA, ISNA, UKIM, FOSIS because in my opinion and experience they lack Sunnah. There are some good people in these organisations as organisations I see a problem with their approach
   

Now read these four lines and say which words and which terms do you have a problem with and on what grounds?

It is nothing which I have not said before at all.

Then I will move forwards and make other points.