The following members appreciate this topic: rizmalek, member2, super-glue, ummi taalib, sweetmuslimahk1, Seifeddine-M, Yasin, abu mohammed 6 guests appreciate this topic.
Joined:
6th Oct 2008 Longevity:
28% Location:
London Posts:
8021 Gender:
Brother Reputation:
1826
Posted on 13th August 2011 17:27
0
3
This talk is not against any organization or anyone who follows one of the 4 schools of thought.
Download or listen to one of the talks given regarding the Salafi Movement.
Did you know that the Salafiya is a movement in support of the Pharao, find out how.
Find out how they have lied against Imam Bukhari, find out how their scholars have lied, find out what the authentic scholars of the middle East think, find out how their scholars were kicked out, find out why they dont do 8 rakaat in Makkah or Madinah.
We spend hundreds of hours ensuring you receive a quality service from this site. We do not fall into the advertisement schemes as all the ads contain elements of Haraam including Haraam Islamic links. Please consider setting up a £1 monthly donation. May Allah (swt) reward you.
Joined:
6th Oct 2008 Longevity:
28% Location:
London Posts:
8021 Gender:
Brother Reputation:
1826
Posted on 16th August 2011 10:53
0
0
"Muadh_Khan" wrote:
Asslamo Allaikum,
I also believe that Shaykh (Maulana) Abdur-Raheem Limbada (HA) acted in an inappropriate manner.
Jazakullah Khairun
Maybe he got a little carried away. I think that was because he must have been told that there were salafi's present. Over all, what he said was based on books written by other major scholars.
And yes the comment was not needed about the scholar.
Joined:
1st Feb 2008 Longevity:
40% Location:
UK Posts:
1229 Gender:
Brother Reputation:
1077
Posted on 16th August 2011 11:06
0
2
"abu mohammed" wrote:
"Muadh_Khan" wrote:
Asslamo Allaikum,
I also believe that Shaykh (Maulana) Abdur-Raheem Limbada (HA) acted in an inappropriate manner.
Jazakullah Khairun
Maybe he got a little carried away. I think that was because he must have been told that there were salafi's present. Over all, what he said was based on books written by other major scholars.
And yes the comment was not needed about the scholar.
Asslamo Allaikum,
He called Shaykh Al-Albani (RA) "Stupid-Idiot". Shaykh Abdur-Raheem Limbada is a Scholar of Hadeeth and he was:
In a Masjid
In Aitekaaf
And calling a dead (Scholar) let alone any other Muslim that openly
This is against Sunnah and not the Tareeqa of Ulama of Deoband.
How would Shaykh Abdur-Raheem Limbada feel if someone called Shaykhul-Hadeeth (Maulana) Zakariyya (RA) the same any day of the week let alone in Ramadhan and in Aitekaaf?
Joined:
6th Oct 2008 Longevity:
28% Location:
London Posts:
8021 Gender:
Brother Reputation:
1826
Posted on 16th August 2011 12:23
0
0
Jazakallah for pointing that out.
I agree with you, he should not have made such comments. I also disagree with that.
Please note,these are not my thoughts or comments but what was said in the talk.
I just had another recap of the talk (nearly three quarters down part one)
Shaykh starts with an explanation of how scholars had warned Shaykh Albani of his misdoings, then goes on to explain how Shaykh Albani splits up the books of Hadith. He expalins how the schoalrs have shown how Shaykh Albani is going towards becoming an "inkaar e Hadith" "Rejecter of Hadith".
Later on he mentions his journey on Hajj 2009 with some top scholars. He mentions the name of a very experienced Hadith teacher, who has been teaching Sahih Bukhari for more than 40 years and knows the Hadith inside out. This shayk he mentions is Shaykul Hadith Maulana Yunus (r.a.). Whilst they were in Madinah, someone came upto Maulana Yunus(ra) and said that there is this book found in Madinah that states that there are around 100 - 120 Hadith in Shahih Bukhari that are weak. Maulana gets very angry and says "yeh sub woh Albani ki shararat hai, us Khabis ne yeh shuru kia hai", "This is the doings of Albani, that khabis started this". Khabis = impure, base, wicked.
He then goes on to say that Shaykh Albani was kicked out of Madinah for his statements. He, Shaykh Albani, said that the Niqab is not part of the Hijab, but Arabs are very particular about covering the face, The Arabs didnt like this, then he mentions the green dome and the grave of the Prophet SAW, Shaykh Albani says that the grave should not be in the Masjid. This is when Mufti Abdur Raheem says, "The Stupid Idiot does not know that the grave was outside the Masjid", The Masjid was extended around the grave. Shaykh Albani's view was that the grave should be taken out of the Masjid and re buried. This statement of Albani has caused fitna and certain people have been quoted as saying that if they get control of the Masjid, they will dig the grave out and re bury the Prophet in Al-Baqi.
I am not justifiying Mufti Limbada's use of words, but you can see where the anger and rage could of come from. (i have done another post called "under threat" dealing with these issues.
Imagine what would happen to a person who even makes the suggestion of digging up the Prophets grave. He would be called more than a Stupid Idiot. Infact, he would be accused of Blasphemy, and we all know the punisment of Blasphemy. (bearing in mind all the rules that come with it)
Joined:
6th Oct 2008 Longevity:
28% Location:
London Posts:
8021 Gender:
Brother Reputation:
1826
Posted on 16th August 2011 12:36
0
0
Sister Ummi Taalib, please share your views after hearing the talks, Jazakallah.
I am a Junior and learn from my Seniors. Brother Muadh, Maulana Yasin, your self and many others on this site are my seniors in knowledge, I respect every bodies views as long as they are valid.
I have disagreed on certain things that have been done or said by Mufti Abdur Raheem Limbada, but then again my knowledge is very limited. But thats just my opinion.
