Create an account
Most Reputable Members

Documentary on Deobandees

You have contributed 0.0% of this topic

Thread Tools
Post New Topic Filter by poster  
Topic Appreciation
Appreciate
To appreciate this topic, click 'Appreciate Topic' on the right.
mkdon101
Rank Image
Offline
Joined:
11th Aug 2014
Longevity:
0%
Location:
Unspecified
Posts:
597
Gender:
Brother
Reputation:
182
#61 [Permalink] Posted on 5th May 2016 10:34
lol those who use majlis as a some sort of evidence should follow them in everything then.dont pick and choose. they are known to be ultra strict/conservative which is not a bad thing per se but just dont pick the bits u like they say and reject the ones u find too hard for ur nafs
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
Site Support
Please DONATE generously towards Muftisays

We spend hundreds of hours ensuring you receive a quality service from this site. We do not fall into the advertisement schemes as all the ads contain elements of Haraam including Haraam Islamic links. Please consider setting up a £1 monthly donation. May Allah (swt) reward you.

Sleepyhead
Rank Image
Offline
Joined:
1st May 2016
Longevity:
0%
Location:
Unspecified
Posts:
10
Gender:
Brother
Reputation:
-25
#62 [Permalink] Posted on 6th May 2016 12:12
mkdon101 wrote:
View original post

The fatwas are not from The Majlis.
report post quote code quick quote reply
Agree x 1
abu mohammed
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
Joined:
6th Oct 2008
Longevity:
28%
Location:
London
Posts:
18704
Gender:
Brother
Reputation:
5175
#63 [Permalink] Posted on 6th May 2016 12:17
Sleepyhead wrote:
View original post

Can you respond to the other posts prior to that? Jzk.

Post 1

Post 2

Post 3 (you don't have to reply)
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
Sleepyhead
Rank Image
Offline
Joined:
1st May 2016
Longevity:
0%
Location:
Unspecified
Posts:
10
Gender:
Brother
Reputation:
-25
#64 [Permalink] Posted on 6th May 2016 12:18
abu mohammed wrote:
View original post


1. The opening post on the thread spoke about "speaking on camera." If the implication is not to make a film, be it on TV or YouTube, what is the implication? A film without faces? Barbara was going to accept being faceless? Really?
2. The question was not based on errors. It is a straight lift from Mu'adh's various postings.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
Asaaghir
Rank Image
Asaaghir's avatar
Joined:
13th Jun 2014
Longevity:
0%
Location:
Tragic-istan
Posts:
286
Gender:
Brother
Reputation:
107
#65 [Permalink] Posted on 20th March 2017 17:07
What happened to this.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
tasbeeh
Rank Image
tasbeeh's avatar
Offline
Joined:
21st Jun 2016
Longevity:
0%
Location:
Unspecified
Posts:
60
Gender:
Brother
Reputation:
20
#66 [Permalink] Posted on 21st March 2017 00:50
Muadh_Khan wrote:
View original post


Hmmmm when did it become HALAL for women to appear in front of the camera??
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
Muadh_Khan
Rank Image
Muadh_Khan's avatar
Offline
Joined:
1st Feb 2008
Longevity:
40%
Location:
UK
Posts:
7751
Gender:
Brother
Reputation:
6005
#67 [Permalink] Posted on 21st March 2017 08:12
tasbeeh wrote:
View original post


Have you seen what I was going to do? Isn't it wise to wait for something and then criticise it so you know all the facts?

If your criticism is valid, it would be taken on board.
Posted via the Muftisays Android App
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
tasbeeh
Rank Image
tasbeeh's avatar
Offline
Joined:
21st Jun 2016
Longevity:
0%
Location:
Unspecified
Posts:
60
Gender:
Brother
Reputation:
20
#68 [Permalink] Posted on 21st March 2017 11:41
Muadh_Khan wrote:
View original post


No need to wait. Your request of desperately wanting sisters to speak in front of the camera is WRONG.

Accept your wrong and stop trying to justify your mistake.
report post quote code quick quote reply
Winner x 1
Muadh_Khan
Rank Image
Muadh_Khan's avatar
Offline
Joined:
1st Feb 2008
Longevity:
40%
Location:
UK
Posts:
7751
Gender:
Brother
Reputation:
6005
#69 [Permalink] Posted on 21st March 2017 11:47

tasbeeh wrote:
View original post

If it makes you feel better and your Nafs is satisfied at criticising without looking at what can or could have been done, no problems.

If you are happy at my expense (without doing anything), I am fine with that.

Jazakallahu Khayran

Sleepyhead wrote:
View original post

There are many ways of recording this without somebody being actually on the Screen. Watch some of the documentaries where people appear and their face, voice, identity everything (about them) is hidden.

It’s no big deal actually.

report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
abu mohammed
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
Joined:
6th Oct 2008
Longevity:
28%
Location:
London
Posts:
18704
Gender:
Brother
Reputation:
5175
#70 [Permalink] Posted on 21st March 2017 11:55
Muadh_Khan wrote:
View original post

That's correct.

I once gave an interview for Channel 4 News and they used my shadow and other images of Regents Park Mosque as I requested not to be shown on TV.

There are also programs that can be used to change the voices of females to males or even robotic (Try Audacity voice changer on YouTube for example)

Everything can still be done.

Alternatively, the sisters can WRITE and it can be read out using cartoon typography. There are so many ways of doing it and then a name came be provided as the source.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
Back to top Post New Topic