So Lets stick to the facts.
If we accept the legal principle of innocent until proven guilty that automatically means you are taking side.? On what basis and under what system of Law?
"Just like evidence is needed to prove that NAK is guilty. Evidence is needed to prove that these Sisters are lying.It isn't rocket science to figure this out, is it? "
Again under what system of law does the above come under..? Is it not the case that the burden of proof is on the accuser? if no proof is brought forward then the claim would be considered invalid would it not?
If no accusers come forward publicly and if the nature of the exact accusations is not put forward then what is the legal position on that?
If other individuals come forward saying they have intimate knowledge but fail to clarify what the allegations and misconduct are then what is the legal position on that? What is the legal position both Islamic and in the secular man made system on hearsay evidence? and all the above issues.
When it comes to legal judgement is it not the case the law is dispassionate and from a legal point of view it must be based on evidence? it cannot be based on emotionalism.