Another fabricated hadith in fazaile ramadhan

Hazrat Mufti Saheb,

1. Firstly the Takhreej is not complete and no work is done on Ahadeeth used in the explanations; mostly deals with the chapter heading (Ahadeeth).
2. Secondly, would you agree that gradation of Narrators is “Dhanni and not Qat’e (absolute)” i.e. there is disagreement on narrators? So even if someone grades a narrator has “weak” it is a Dhanni matter and can be disagreed with.
3. Thirdly, would you agree that there are many works of Ahadeeth which have weak narrations (or even fabricated ones) i.e. Fadhail-e-Aamaal is not the first?
4. Fourthly, do you accept that there is a difference between narrating a fabrication (on purpose) and narrating a fabrication (in error and without knowledge)?
5. The matter in this thread is POLITICAL and not a lot to do with the science of Hadeeth. The Ghair-Muqallid sect disagree with Tableegh and they have found a rallying cry from some of the Ulama (such as yourself on Fadhail-e-Aamaal). If you and every Deobandi Mufti on Planet Earth disbands and disowns Fadhail-e-Aamaal tomorrow morning, the day after Tomorrow Ghair-Muqallid will move to another objection.

This is because Ghair-Muqallid are a minority and it is in their Interest to define themselves as “Anti-something” the day they find agreement their reason for existence disappears. They know that so they will pick fights with you on Rafa Yadain etc knowing fully well that the position can be argued for and against.

If you agree on Kashmir, they will make a separate Jamaat to do Jihad.

If you agree on the need for relief effort in Pakistan, they will make a separate Jamaat to raise funds.

If you agree on the need to implement Shariah, they will make a separate Jamaat to fight elections.

The issue is dead simple that this is a NOT an Academic discussion but a matter of survival for minority sect.

Have you all read the disclaimer tab on their site?

2. Since the field of Al-Jarh wa Ta’dil (verification of narrators) is based on individual Ijtihad  (analogical deductions) of the scholars, it is therefore prone to difference of opinion. Hence, if there be any disagreement concerning the classification of any hadith, it should be understood in this light.

Can you present an example? You won't be able to, because we have difference with them in aqaid and we analyze the dalail of aqaid based on the rules that are for them. For targheeb o tarheeb, we analyze as this should be..