Forum Menu - Click/Swipe to open
 

Proof or Lack of proof of Al Qaida

You have contributed 0.0% of this topic

Thread Tools
Appreciate
Topic Appreciation
To appreciate this topic, click 'Appreciate Topic' on the right.
Rank Image
super-glue's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
398
Brother
666
super-glue's avatar
#1 [Permalink] Posted on 3rd February 2019 14:07
A request to admins to move all the posts about Al Qaida from the 9/11 thread into this.

Please post your proofs that AL QAEDA is a real network with heads and members.

The funding of Afghanistan against the soviet is well established. And it's believed at that time the CIA named this "Al Qaeda" as it was the American's network for "the enemy of my enemy"

But post 9/11 it's an invisible bogeyman and if you believe otherwise please provide the proof here. Shills, actors and agents can be identified in this thread as well.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
1,009
Brother
468
#2 [Permalink] Posted on 3rd February 2019 15:15
What benefits if any is there in such a thread?

What yardstick are we using to measure truth or falsehood in this thread

Can you prove they didn't exist?

It's not necessary for everyone to know everything. The Prophet foretold us about the age of confusion. We are living it now. So 90% of all news regardless who gives it is false and biased.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Like x 1Agree x 1Disagree x 1Facepalm x 1
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
20,591
Brother
6,765
abu mohammed's avatar
#3 [Permalink] Posted on 3rd February 2019 15:46
mkdon101 wrote:
View original post

Please post in the correct thread :)

The confusion is amongst those who claim the title of being a Deobandi is on Haq Only!

Your comments sit there very well
report post quote code quick quote reply
+0 -0Disagree x 1
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
1,009
Brother
468
#4 [Permalink] Posted on 3rd February 2019 16:28
abu mohammed wrote:
View original post



The thread is about Al qaeda existing. That's where I posted.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
20,591
Brother
6,765
abu mohammed's avatar
#5 [Permalink] Posted on 3rd February 2019 16:55
As you once said in a previous matter:
mkdon101 wrote:
View original post

:)
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Like x 1
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
1,009
Brother
468
#6 [Permalink] Posted on 3rd February 2019 17:08
Lol giving me a taste of my own medicine. Too many threads I can't keep up.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Yasin's avatar
London, UK
5,581
Brother
254
Yasin's avatar
#7 [Permalink] Posted on 3rd February 2019 17:32
super-glue wrote:
View original post


Those posts are older than the opening post of this thread so merging them will be confusing. The posts have been split from that thread if it helps.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
748
Brother
256
#8 [Permalink] Posted on 3rd February 2019 18:09
Question: were any ' terrorist' attacks any where in the world actually organized and carried out by Muslims or are other non Muslims responsible for orchestrating all attacks?
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
1,009
Brother
468
#9 [Permalink] Posted on 3rd February 2019 18:16
Concerned wrote:
View original post

Answer lies in between both. Some where by Muslims some may have been self orchestrated. Guess we will know on qiyamah.

End of that people n govt will do anything to ensure their survival money and power
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
20,591
Brother
6,765
abu mohammed's avatar
#10 [Permalink] Posted on 3rd February 2019 18:24
Concerned wrote:
View original post

Measure the losses vs the gains and in whose benefit. In most cases its collateral damage! They are willing to kill thousands for $'s

report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
748
Brother
256
#11 [Permalink] Posted on 3rd February 2019 18:33
abu mohammed wrote:
View original post


You didn't answer the question
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
20,591
Brother
6,765
abu mohammed's avatar
#12 [Permalink] Posted on 3rd February 2019 18:53
Concerned wrote:
View original post

Your need to do your homework :)
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Like x 1
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
748
Brother
256
#13 [Permalink] Posted on 3rd February 2019 22:38
Its pretty farfetched to think non Muslims, CIA free masons etc are behind every single attack that happens. There are Muslims with such ideologies who willingly plan and carry out such attacks. Yes other groups may be behind some of the attacks.

I recently heard a respected Maulana saying free masons are responsible for the tabligh issues, and they have infiltrates tabligh over 20 years ago.
This particular Maulana does not use technology unless necessary. He is saying this based on what what he heard from another buzrug over 20 years ago. Ironically he will also learn information from those who got it via technolofy. I find it careless when people make these accusations without any proof, it makes them less credible.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Agree x 1Disagree x 1Facepalm x 1
back to top
Rank Image
xs11ax's avatar
Unspecified
1,996
Brother
1,613
xs11ax's avatar
#14 [Permalink] Posted on 3rd February 2019 22:57
Concerned wrote:
View original post

I don't know about freemasons, but it would be very naive to think that security services WOULDN'T infiltrate organisations that have massive amounts of influence over massive amounts of people across massive amounts of the globe.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+2 -0Like x 2
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
748
Brother
256
#15 [Permalink] Posted on 3rd February 2019 23:07
Yes but surely you need proof before saying those things. On the apparent we have two groups of Muslims having conflict with each other., based on their statements and actions. If we want to blame free masons etc, then don't so without proof. Strike up a conversation about the topic but don't categorically say the free masons are behind this.

Otherwise why don't we look deeper into everything that happens in life and consider it a conspiracy without evidence.

I just read about a case where police charged a criminal for a number of matters. People are commenting with absolutely no evidence that it sounds fishy and they find it hard to believe the person committed all of the crimes. The persons family is not denying anything and making claims against the police, yet strangers who are clueless want to make accusations against the police .
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top

 

Quick Reply

CAPTCHA - As you are a guest, you are required to answer the following:


In the above image: What shape is the red shape ('round' is not a shape)?