Forum Menu - Click/Swipe to open
 

1969 Moon Landings were FAKE

Jump to page:

You have contributed 25.8% of this topic

Thread Tools
Appreciate
Topic Appreciation
abu mohammed
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
20,661
Brother
6,815
abu mohammed's avatar
#76 [Permalink] Posted on 7th February 2019 20:21
bint e aisha wrote:
View original post

I don't know, you make a good point if you are correct. And this was a genuine question due to all those videos we see of them trying to eat and drink in space, the stuff is all over the place.

The fact that they bounce on the moon, no gravity etc, I would've thought that the moon-sand, if lifted off the ground, should behave in the same way as them hopping, or at least come back to the ground at a slower speed, rather than the same/normal speed.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
super-glue's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
399
Brother
667
super-glue's avatar
#77 [Permalink] Posted on 7th February 2019 20:31
abu mohammed wrote:
View original post


Think about how slowly dust falls on earth. Dust particles look almost stationary on earth. Our movement effects the particles in any direction. On the moon the dust should be up 6 times longer and one of the smoking guns was the Lunar Rover which created the arcs from the wheel spins and moon shills actually use this as proof they went to the moon because it can't be done on Earth. Complete bull. Look at any dune buggy video if light or powerful enough (weight to power ratio) then you'll see the arcs even bigger on Earth. On the moon they should have been 4-6 times higher and lasted in the air for a very, very long time.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Like x 1
back to top
Rank Image
super-glue's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
399
Brother
667
super-glue's avatar
#78 [Permalink] Posted on 7th February 2019 20:37
abu mohammed wrote:
View original post


In zero gravity they ate from tubes as far as I am aware. The floating water and food you see flying around from the ISS videos nowadays are lol I'd rather not go into that joke. But if you start a thread, I can post plenty of comedy these clowns do to continue their tax funding.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
bint e aisha's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
1,019
Sister
631
bint e aisha's avatar
#79 [Permalink] Posted on 7th February 2019 20:40
abu mohammed wrote:
View original post

Quote:
The fact that they bounce on the moon, no gravity etc

This is the confusion I guess. Do you think there's zero gravity on Moon? This is incorrect. There IS a gravitational force on Moon but it is lesser than Earth coz its mass and size both are smaller.

According to Newton's law of universal gravitation: Every particle attracts every other particle in the universe with a force which is directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between their centers.

Quote:
at least come back to the ground at a slower speed, rather than the same/normal speed.

Yes this is right. It should come back with a slower speed because it does not weigh as much as it weighs on Earth.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Like x 1
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
20,661
Brother
6,815
abu mohammed's avatar
#80 [Permalink] Posted on 7th February 2019 21:58
bint e aisha wrote:
View original post

Jzk, so what I was trying to get to is still correct that this is an additional proof of their hoax.

MashaAllah sister, you have good knowledge on the topic of Einstein and his theories.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Like x 1
back to top
Rank Image
bint e aisha's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
1,019
Sister
631
bint e aisha's avatar
#81 [Permalink] Posted on 8th February 2019 01:54
abu mohammed wrote:
View original post

Quote:
MashaAllah sister, you have good knowledge on the topic of Einstein and his theories.

This was Newton's law. Einstein went way further and his theories are more fascinating and mind-boggling.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
#82 [Permalink] Posted on 8th February 2019 03:11
bint e aisha wrote:
View original post


g on moon is 1/6th that is on earth.
So the so called astronauts are enacting as if their body has not adopted the lower g on moon.

report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
20,661
Brother
6,815
abu mohammed's avatar
#83 [Permalink] Posted on 8th February 2019 06:43
bint e aisha wrote:
View original post

I was testing my theory of members reading what they think is written, MashaAllah, you passed that test :)
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Servant.Of.Allah's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
596
Brother
492
Servant.Of.Allah's avatar
#84 [Permalink] Posted on 8th February 2019 10:05
This post has been reported. It could be due to breaking rules or something as simple as bad use of bbcodes which breaks the page format. We will attend to this soon.
Blocked from replying in this thread.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+0 -0Optimistic x 1
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
20,661
Brother
6,815
abu mohammed's avatar
#85 [Permalink] Posted on 8th February 2019 11:40
Servant.Of.Allah wrote:
View original post

I saw your post before driving away and wanted to respond, but it looks like your post was already reported by someone else, Alhumdulillah.

You may wonder why I say that even though it contained one good advice.

Research shows that the more someone lies, the easier it gets, and the more likely they are to do it again.

It's not about science and research, it's about LYING!

A believer cannot lie! (Hadith) So why should we live on lies and allow our children to accept these lies?

Many of the lies are to defame Islam, to prove Islam is backwards, to prove Islam is not the answer - They want to prove and practice the opposite of LAILAHA ILLALLAH!

Quote:
Psychologists have documented children lying as early as age 2. Some experts even consider lying a developmental milestone, like crawling and walking, because it requires sophisticated planning, attention and the ability to see a situation from someone else’s perspective to effectively manipulate them. But for most people, lying gets limited as we develop a sense of morality and the ability to self-regulate.


Our children are brought up to believe lies as if they were FACT and HAQ - When they grow up into adults, they still believe those lies and until they die, they will believe these lies unless exposed.

What does this have to do with our Deen? A lot!

One lie is just the beginning, then another lie and another lie, so much so that our children are taught in school to believe that we came from apes! That kills the childrens Aqeedah from a very young age - so it has something to do with our Deen from many angles.

In this topic, they talk about technological marvels - that aren't true. But Millions of Muslims believe it and want to be part of it.

When we talk of the miracles of The Prophet (saw) our children may not accept them - thus affecting their Deen!

I recall in a lecture by Mufti Saeed Ahmed Palanpuri in my former local Masjid in London about 20+ years ago, he said that someone asked him a question.
Question - Mufti Saahib, The West have reached the moon and you sit here talking about how to clean yourself in the toilet, when we will ever advance?
Answer - I'm sitting here teaching you how to clean yourself after releaving your self, won't they be going to the toilet on the moon, will this lesson not be needed there too?

The point he was making was that our Deen is perfect till the last day, no matter what techonological advances man can make!


No one has crossed the radiation barriers surrounding the earth and beyond except our beloved Prophet (saw)
report post quote code quick quote reply
+2 -0Winner x 1
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
20,661
Brother
6,815
abu mohammed's avatar
#86 [Permalink] Posted on 8th February 2019 12:52
One of the many Moon Rock samples they allegedy brought back from the moon turned out to be a fake.

No surprise there!
Moon Rock Turns Out to be Fake

Astronauts who landed on the Moon collected 2,415 samples of Moon rocks weighing a total of 842 pounds (382 kilograms). Most of these rocks were collected during the Apollo 15, 16, and 17 missions.
phys.org/news/2009-09-moon-fake.html#jCp

The Dutch national Rijksmuseum made an embarrassing announcement last week that one of its most loved possessions, a moon rock, is a fake -- just an old piece of petrified wood that's never been anywhere near the moon.

The Rijksmuseum is famous for its fine art collections, especially paintings by Rembrandt and other masters. One of its lesser known objects, the "moon rock", was first unveiled in October 2006 as the centerpiece of a "Fly me to the moon" exhibition. At that time, the museum said the rock symbolized the "exploration of the unknown, colonization of far-away places and bringing back of treasures..." A reading about the "moon rock" was even held on October 7 because it was a full moon!

The rock was given as a private gift to former prime minister Willem Drees Jr in 1969 by the U.S. ambassador to The Netherlands, J. William Middendorf II, during a visit by the Apollo 11 astronauts, Armstrong, Collins and Aldrin, soon after the first moon landing. Drees had been out of office for 11 years, but was considered an elder statesman.

When Drees died in 1988, the rock was donated to the Rijksmuseum, where it has remained ever since. According to a museum spokeswoman, Ms Van Gelder, no one doubted the authenticity of the rock because it was in the prime minister's own collection, and they had vetted the acquisition by a phone call to NASA.

According to an article published by the Rijksmuseum, at one time the rock was insured for approximately half a million dollars, but its actual value is probably no more than around $70.

Former U.S. ambassador, Mr Middendorf was unable to recall the exact details of how the rock came to be in the U.S. State Department's possession. It is known that NASA gave lunar rocks to over 100 countries in the 1970s, but when the rock was displayed in 2006 a space expert told the museum he doubted any material would have been given away so soon after the manned lunar landing.

Researchers from the Free University of Amsterdam immediately doubted the rock was from the moon, and began extensive testing. The tests concluded the rock was petrified wood. U.S. embassy officials were unable to explain the findings, but are investigating.

Even though the tests found the piece is not of lunar origin, the Rijksmuseum curators say they will keep it anyway as a curiosity.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
xs11ax's avatar
Unspecified
2,003
Brother
1,614
xs11ax's avatar
#87 [Permalink] Posted on 8th February 2019 14:05
abu mohammed wrote:
View original post

So if the other rocks can be analysed and confirmed to be from the moon, would that count as proof that man has been or sent probes to the moon?
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
20,661
Brother
6,815
abu mohammed's avatar
#88 [Permalink] Posted on 8th February 2019 14:30
xs11ax wrote:
View original post

What is the composition of a moon rock?
What chemicals should they be looking for?

For all we know, they picked up samples from a large crater on earth and said it was from out of this world, without a doubt.



I've seen such rocks in the Natural History Museum, they look like they came from the sea bed :) Some were boring whilst others were interesting.

Scientists can only go by meteorites for now.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Yasin's avatar
London, UK
5,597
Brother
262
Yasin's avatar
#89 [Permalink] Posted on 8th February 2019 14:41
xs11ax wrote:
View original post


If rocks were confirmed to be from the moon through analysis (see below) then it would only tell you that the rocks are from the moon. It would in no way prove man set foot on the moon. It wouldn't even prove that a probe brought it back because it's said that the poles have a lot of lunar rocks there as debris.

Then there's analysing the rocks. It can only be analysed if there's moon rock samples otherwise it's simply a theory based on things like foreign composition which would tell you it's not from Earth. But then it can be from anywhere and not just the moon.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
#90 [Permalink] Posted on 8th February 2019 14:52
My "andar ki awaaz" (inner voice) is saying, insha Allah one day the fake moon landing will be exposed.
But, I am not denying that, today USA posses 'state of art technology'. They are masters. But lies must get exposed.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+0 -0Ameen x 1
back to top

Jump to page:

 

Quick Reply

CAPTCHA - As you are a guest, you are required to answer the following:


In the above image: What shape is the green shape ('box' is not a shape)?