Forum Menu - Click/Swipe to open
 

Wrong View of Taqleed

You have contributed 0.0% of this topic

Thread Tools
Topic Poll
Dr Zakir Naik is?
» Only good in comparative religion and not Fiqh
100%
5 members | 0 guests
» Good in Fiqh and fatawa
0%
0 members | 0 guests
» Not sure
0%
0 members | 0 guests
Appreciate
Topic Appreciation
no members yet
1 guest appreciates this topic.
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
22,597
Brother
9,007
abu mohammed's avatar
#1 [Permalink] Posted on 22nd October 2010 15:14
First of all, I would like to appologies for posting so many topics at once. The major reason behind this is not only because it is very much needed, but also because at this moment in time I have a lot of time doing nothing as the economy has once again slowed down (Well at least for my trade), therefore I have taken advantage of this time and posted a number of articles and blogs. Once our business picks up, then Allah knows best if I would be able to provide such posts.

I have taken this from my blog Wrong View on Taqleed Click here to see video.

For the non Urdu Speakers, (Please note, my Urdu is NOT my mother tongue or my second language so I can not fully translate the interview word to word) Dr Zakir Naik, whom I believe is a fantastic orrator of Comparative religion, May Allah increase him in his knowledge, is saying that Taqleed is to follow with the eyes shut, this is a basic definition, for example, if you have trust in someone like a doctor, you go to the Doctor for medication & you take the medication with no questions asked, this is to accept with your eyes shut, He says the word Taqleed comes from a word used for the ropes that are tied around the necks of animal. He then says that if you investigate that the person you are taking from trust him fully, then its not a problem. But if you find some strong evidence that goes contrary to the findings of the one being followed in light of the Quran & Hadith, and you STILL follow that person then, THIS is called Taqleed. (upto 58sec).

Then he says that if you go to a Mufti and he passes a Fatwa and you accept it because he is more knowledgable than the rest of the ordinary people, fine, but if someone comes to you and says that the fatwa is wrong and here is the evidence from Quran & Hadith, and you still accept the wrong fatwa, after all the evidences has been given and you still follow this way, then THIS is called Taqleed. And in My (Dr Zakir Naik) opinion this is wrong. (Upto 1min 35sec) Yes I agree with you upto here

The interviewer is asking him that all the people who are Muqallids (make Taqleed of 1 Imam) are they preserving the Deen in a positive manner or are they causing harm to the Deen. Dr Zakir Naik says that it has caused Harm to the Deen. Then he quotes the famous saying from all the Imams that "If you find any fatwa of mine that goes against the Quran and Hadith, then let go of my fatwa"Yes, they made this statements as they were Muhaddith, Mujtahids and the greatest Faqihs that ever lived. This statement was for the other Mujtahid Imams of which there has not been one for a very very long time. Please click here to see the greatness of an Imam Dr Zakir Naik is suggeting that when the Imams came, the collections of Hadith had not been done, this was done way after that and they knew that they didnt have all the Hadith or information needed to pass the most accurate judgement. Even though they were closer to the era of the Prophet (SAW) and that thay saw the Sahaba (Only Imam Abu Hanifa saw some) and the Tabi'een, They were from the Kharul Quroon, The best of generations. They did not intend to create a FIRQA AKA Sect.(upto 2mins 44sec)WRONG again, (I have heard Dr Zakir speak many many times even live, He is my favourite speaker on comparative religion, and he always says that he use to stammer and Alhumdillilah I have never heard him stammer before until today. Then he goes onto say that in my practice, for example Imam Abu Hanifa says that in Salah after Surah Fatiha has been recited, one must say Aameen slowly, where as when I read Sahih Bukhari, it says in many places "Say Aameen loudly" "Aameen bil Jahr", therfore I say Aameen loudly. Thats why I say I am 100% Hanafi because Imam Abu Hanifa says that if you find stronger evidence then that is my way, therefore, those who claim to be Hanafi are only 80% Hanafi. LIE, LIE, LIE, Mufti Abdur Raheem Limbada in his talk The Reality of the Salaf Part2, it can be heard here, Brilliant talks, Press the Stand by button to switch it on, he says that This is a LIE against Imam Bukhari, (although it will be found in other books), The word "LOUDLY" "JAHR" is not used, Look it up in the Arabic version. Infact, I think he even said jokingly that if you can find me this Hadith in Sahih Bukhari I will give you £1000. He said that the wording is the same as is for the Hadith regarding rising from Ruku where the Muqtadi (follower) says Rabana lakal Hamd, so if the wording is the same, then why dont you say Rabana lakal Hamd loudly. He then goes on and on. Then he quotes the Famous verse of the Quran, "O you who believe! Follow Allah; follow the Messenger and those of authority (Amr) amongst you. And if you dispute, then refer to Allah and the Messenger if you really do believe in Allah and in the last day. (Surah al-Nisaa Verse 59)(This time fully for a change) fine, lets not dispute, I am a normal man, but there is a conflict in the view of Aameen, So one should investigate the matter and follow the most correct opinion, we are not following anything new here, he says all four schools accept that after the Quran, Sahih Bukhari is the most authentic book of Hadith. Imam Bukhari came 200 years after the Prophet (SAW) So If Sahih Bukhari is the most authentic book after the Quran, then If there are countless Hadith in Sahih Bukhari that tells us to say Aameen loud (NOT TRUE) then why dont we follow that.

Dr. You need to see a Scholar and study Fiqh. I am not capable of doing this, neither is the majority of the Muslim World, So if the Mujtahid Imams who were followed by the Greatest Muhaddith that ever lived and who were the actual teachers of Imam Bukhari and the like then who are we to find the strongest opinions. Imam Bukharis teacher Yahya ibn Maeen was also a Hanafi, and Imam Bukhari said that if there was any ony in knowledge that he feared, it was Yahya ibn Maeen.

I hope that answers your question

This is Not an attack on or to ridicule Dr. Zakir Naik. This is only to emphasis that he is a great speaker on comparative religion ONLY. He is not a Scholar of Islam and he says that himself. Being famous and a Muslim on TV, he influences many Muslims and unfortunately he sometimes misleads people with is incorrect opinions with regards to fiqh.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top