xs11ax wrote:
View original post
Which "dress"?
You have contributed 0.0% of this topic
Which "dress"?
You have not clarified anything.
You have not said where Mufti Rafi Usmani (HA) has exactly and precisely stated what you are alleging.
You have also not said as to where Maulana Qasim Nanotwi (RA) only venerated “green colour†and nothing else associated with Nabi (Sallalaho Alaihe Wassallam)
You have also not stated what makes you classify the action (above) as Bid’ah
Since you have chosen not to do your homework, do you accept the remote possibility that you may be misunderstanding something particularly when you have not even heard (originally) what is in the talk?
You have not quoted your sources and not even heard or investigated what Mufti Rafi Usmani (HA) actually says. You are also not willing to believe those who heard him that he never says, “Pray behind Shias!"
Isn’t it fair for you to either listen to it yourself or at least believe others who have heard it, but you are willing to do neither.
There is nothing to suggest that Maulana Qasim Nanotwi (RA) only venerated the green colour and nothing else associated.
Once again, you have not directly quoted anything and you are not willing to believe anyone else who said that he never said or practised it.
You have quoted an action to be Bid’ah but not willing to explain as to why you think it is a Bid’ah.
So what should be done about South African debate? :P
Bhai, what has gotten into you today? You are neither a South African nor Pakistani :lol
Ajeeb situation...
Do you realise that this is a partial and incomplete translation? Once again, is there any part of you which has some doubt that perhaps based on “partial, out of context, incomplete translation†may be you are getting the wrong end of the stick?
In other words, you have constructed a strawman in your mind and you want others to refute the strawman which exists nowhere else but your mind? If I take time off from my work, my committements, my family and everything else to correctly put this line into context with exact verbatim translation, where will it take us?
P.S: This means nothing like what you are imagining it means. You can (of course) listen to a few minutes (and you are fluent in Urdu) to directly grasp that he is not saying anything remotely close to what you are debating about.
is very different to revereing a colour that has been used on a dome that came into being over 1000 years after the Prophet left us. Otherwise let's start revereing other things that was close to the Prophet as well. The colour black and white to start off with. Also the colour gold from the golden jali as well. Where does it stop?
It doesn’t!
Ishq-e-Rasool (Sallalaho Alaihe Wassallam) is the epitome of our Eemaan. We love each and every aspect of our Nabi (Sallalaho Alaihe Wassallam) even if it is a colour which has merely become associated 1000 years later.
A piece of the Jaali (grill) in Madina Munawwarah is beloved to us then all the Gold in the world.
On the day of judgement we will be with whom we Love and we hope to be with Nabi (Sallalaho Alaihe Wassallam)
None of this is an obligation in Islamic Shariah, it is an expression of love and love has no price!
We don’t really care.
as well. The colour black and white to start off with. Also the colour gold from the golden jali as well. to be more blessed than the Ka'abah and Arsh. It's to do with their love for the Prophet .
This cannot be undone and I am sure it will be greatly appreciated.
Please wait...
