They cannot, People cannot think out of the box.
Shariah requires evidence to accuse someone of Kuf'r. We meet hundreds of Muslims whose parents, children are not "Muslims", stupid to think they are also Kaafir because of family connections.
An old good friend of mine was "Ex-Jew", Full beaded Sunnah wearing brother so should I call him "Jew" because his entire family INCLUDING HIS WIFE was Jew? This brother has now passed away and may Allah Ta'ala give him Jannah (Ameen).
Another good friend of mind is HINDU, his mother (HINDU) goes to temple every week and ask me to advise her to several issues? Is this guy Hindu because of that? Full beaded Sunnah wearing brother....
Pakistanees are emotionally dis-balanced people, so what if Jemima Khan's parents are Jewish, how does make Imran Khan Jewish? By the same token nobody is calling him a Sahabi or making Bay't on his hand as Mahdi (AS) just because we are asking for evidence for him being a "Jew" or Qadiyani. He has categorically expressed his Aqeedah and that is all Shariah requires.
Imran Khan may have committed Zina, his Ex-wife may be Jew (her family certainly is) WHAT THE HECK does that has to do Imran Khan N-O-W?
In my family there are plenty of Secularists/Modernists, does that make me one? There are people in my family where the wife covers (Niqab) and husband has no beard and the way where husband has beard and wife does not even take a Hijab, now what? Should we pass Fatwaas of Kuf'r on spouses?
P.S: Really stupid conversation and shows the shallowness and upbringing of a person who cannot get their head right.
Accusation:
Shias use AS with Sayyidina Mahdi. I thought you were Sunni, previously. Have you gone off track now? Or have you used AS by mistake? Or do you mean something else with this term (AS)? Or do you have any Sharai' evidence for that?
Exact Quote (Everyone judge for yourself):
Mufti Rasheed Ahmed Ludhyanwi (RA) and others have advised to refrain from addressing Mahdi (AS) as "Imam" Mahdi (AS). There is no such thing in the Sunni doctrine at all, no one calls him "Imam" Mahdi (AS) it is a Rafidhi terminology. I assumed that you are Sunni, previously.
Consider it or have your ego brush this aside, don't really care...
Why do we need to "forget" about Sayyiduna Mahdi (AS) to speak about these topics? These are genuine and grave concerns and so is the emergence of Dajjal, second coming of Sayyiduna Isa (AS) and Mahdi (AS). Why does it needs to be neglected?
There is a serious problem with garbage collection in Karachi:
www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-49562462
W-H-Y do we need to F-O-R-G-E-T about Mahdi (AS) in order to address the filth problem in Karachi?
Loading Qur'aan Verse 
How much hatred has penetrated a heart for a person to blatantly twist and lie about crystal clear text? It is even in quotes what I am trying to say!
Now, you are making accusations on a dead Mufti let alone a "Muslim" how has passed away. Sayyindua Ali (RA) is the son-in-law and cousin of Nabi (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) only an arrogant soul will give such a stupid example and someone whose brain is on a high would declare the STUPIDITY to be "informative".
The poison in your heart prevents you from understanding simple text even though it was in "quotes", let me now make the issue in RED so everyone else can get the point, you obviously will nether understand nor apologise for your errors because arrogance knows no bounds.
Instead of actually admitting that you misread what was being said (repeatedly) you keep on marching with more accusations towards Mufti Rasheed Ahmed Ludhyanwi (RA) and making STUPID comments and remarks on the son-in-law and cousin of Nabi (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam). The poison knows no bounds!
Mufti Rasheed Ahmed Ludhyanwi (RA) and others have advised to refrain from addressing Mahdi (AS) as "Imam" Mahdi (AS). There is no such thing in the Sunni doctrine at all, no one calls him "Imam" Mahdi (AS) it is a Rafidhi terminology. I assumed that you are Sunni, previously.
Consider it or have your ego brush this aside, don't really care...
Why do we need to "forget" about Sayyiduna Mahdi (AS) to speak about these topics? These are genuine and grave concerns and so is the emergence of Dajjal, second coming of Sayyiduna Isa (AS) and Mahdi (AS). Why does it needs to be neglected?
There is a serious problem with garbage collection in Karachi:
www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-49562462
W-H-Y do we need to F-O-R-G-E-T about Mahdi (AS) in order to address the filth problem in Karachi?
The Shias believe in "Imam" and their belief is distinct and different to the Sunni definition of "Imam" . In their methodlogy an Imam is someone who can alter Shariah while in the Sunni Aqeedah we believe. Their concept of "Imam" Mahdi is different to Sunni Aqeedah about Sayyiduna Mahdi (AS).
Loading Qur'aan Verse
In classic Academia of Islam, the word "Imam" is never prefixed to Mahdi (AS). This is a habit of India/Pakistani people which they have picked up in errors from the Persian and Afghan culture.
It is safer for Eemaan to refrain from prefixing the word "Imam" to Mahdi (AS).
The issue is not (AS), the issue is "Imam"
This cannot be undone and I am sure it will be greatly appreciated.
Please wait...
