Create an account
Most Reputable Members

Wifaqul Ulama backs Remain

You have contributed 0.0% of this topic

Thread Tools
Post New Topic Filter by poster  
Topic Appreciation
Appreciate
The following members appreciate this topic: Muadh_Khan, abu mohammed, MUSLIMAH_119, Taalibah
abu mohammed
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
Joined:
6th Oct 2008
Longevity:
28%
Location:
London
Posts:
18561
Gender:
Brother
Reputation:
5068
#31 [Permalink] Posted on 21st April 2017 12:53
EU would welcome UK back if election voters veto Brexit – Brussels chief

The president of the European parliament has said Britain would be welcomed back with open arms if voters change their minds about Brexit on 8 June, challenging Theresa May’s claim that “there is no turning back” after article 50.

Speaking after a meeting with the prime minister in Downing Street, Antonio Tajani insisted that her triggering of the departure process last month could be reversed easily by the remaining EU members if there was a change of UK government after the general election and would not even require a court case.

“If the UK, after the election, wants to withdraw [Article 50], then the procedure is very clear,” he said in an interview. “If the UK wanted to stay, everybody would be in favour. I would be very happy.”


He also threatened to veto any Brexit deal if it does not guarantee in full the existing rights of EU citizens in Britain and said this protection would forever be subject to the jurisdiction of the European court of justice (ECJ).

Both are potential sticking points for May, who has promised to end free movement of EU citizens and rid Britain forever of interference by the ECJ, but the European parliament must ratify any Brexit deal agreed by negotiators before it can be completed.

Lawyers are divided on whether the UK can unilaterally change its mind about leaving and are bringing a test case to establish the legal reversibility of article 50, but the parliament president spelled out a process by which a simple political decision by other member states would be sufficient.

“If tomorrow, the new UK government decides to change its position, it is possible to do,” said Tajani. “The final decision is for the 27 member states, but everybody will be in favour if the UK [decides to reverse article 50].”

Though stressing the decision was a matter for the UK electorate alone to consider, the president’s intervention is a rebuke to those who argue that the upcoming general election is not a second chance to consider exiting the EU.

“Britain is leaving the European Union and there can be no turning back,” said May on Tuesday as she called the surprise snap election and promised to strengthen the government’s mandate for pursuing Brexit on any terms.

Tajani, an Italian who recently replaced the German veteran Martin Schulz as the international representative of the key EU institution, said he had a largely positive discussion with the prime minister during their first one-on-one meeting on Thursday.

Yet he warned that the European parliament would veto the entire deal if it the UK does not agree to the preservation of all rights of the estimated 3 million EU citizens already settled in the UK and the 1.2m Britons in Europe.

“We will vote against [it],” he said, adding that he wanted “a clear framework in the next months” on EU citizens agreed at a political level. Negotiators would then work on the technical details covering issues such as reciprocal pensions, health, and other issues, a process that is likely to be prolonged.

He also spoke to allay fears among campaigners that if she wins the election Theresa May will try to stop future rights of those settled in the UK, specifically the rights of French, Polish or other EU citizens to have other family members join them.
This is a right EU citizens have been campaigning to protect as it accommodates future care of widowed parents.

Stressing that there should be no diminution of citizens’ rights after Brexit, he added: “For us it’s important to ensure that Brexit does not have negative effects on their life and rights they are enjoying.”

“We want the same rights as today. For us, the agreement is [to have the same rights] as today [and] yesterday, tomorrow,” he said. “For us, it is a priority and it is a red line,” he said.

He said he was optimistic the prime minister would respect all existing rights enjoyed by European citizens because she wanted the same in return for British citizens in the rest of Europe.

He also said the ECJ would regulate the agreement on EU citizens post Brexit, thereby blocking any bid by a future government to renege on the deal struck.

“Under the [Brexit] treaty everything under the treaty is under the court,” said Tajani in a further contradiction of British government policy.

The EU parliament president nonetheless welcomed May’s decision to call a snap election, saying it was unlikely to delay Brexit talks by more than a week and would provide long-term clarity.

“To have a new government before the beginning of the negotiation is good, not only for the UK but for us, because we will have the same negotiators, the same prime minister and we will know the real situation in the UK,” said the EU president.
“It is better for us to work with the same government and not with a potential election campaign [looming].”

Tajani also struck a more positive note than some MEPs about the prospects for moving on to trade talks with Britain before the end of the two-year window allocated for the exit negotiations.

“We hope before the end of 2017 to have a framework on the exit and immediately afterwards it is possible to start with the negotiations for the day after,” said Tajani, whose press conference in the former Conservative party headquarters building in Smith Square was briefly interrupted by a phone call from the EU’s chief Brexit negotiator, Michel Barnier.

“I will inform the [European] council of this meeting and that it was positive. It’s the beginning, there’s a long way but it’s important to start well.”
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
Site Support
Please DONATE generously towards Muftisays

We spend hundreds of hours ensuring you receive a quality service from this site. We do not fall into the advertisement schemes as all the ads contain elements of Haraam including Haraam Islamic links. Please consider setting up a £1 monthly donation. May Allah (swt) reward you.

mkdon101
Rank Image
Offline
Joined:
11th Aug 2014
Longevity:
0%
Location:
Unspecified
Posts:
547
Gender:
Brother
Reputation:
171
#32 [Permalink] Posted on 21st April 2017 16:26
I think wifaqul should back Corbyn and get as many as their scholars to encourage it in their bayans. For the first time in my lifetime there really is a clear distinction between the good and bad. Yes I know he is a socalist and thus pro gay n stuff but let's not be that spiteful and let a woman who openly hates n targets Islam, takes from the poor, answers to zios and daily mail, cuts education n nhs spending
report post quote code quick quote reply
Optimistic x 1
WifaqulUlama
Rank Image
Offline
Joined:
6th Dec 2015
Longevity:
0%
Location:
Unspecified
Posts:
275
Gender:
Brother
Reputation:
416
#33 [Permalink] Posted on 25th April 2017 16:23

mkdon101 wrote:
View original post

www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_d...

  • In any publicity material (including printed material, media interviews and websites) a charity may promote its views on issues which relate to its objects and activities. However the charity must steer clear of explicitly comparing its views (favourably or otherwise) with those of the political parties or candidates taking part in the election. For example, if a housing charity supports the building of 100,000 new homes, it can outline the housing policies of each party, including how many new homes each party is committed to building, but it must not explicitly call on people to vote for one party or another. The key point is that while charities can attempt to influence public opinion on a particular issue if it furthers or supports their objects, they must leave it to the electorate to make their own decisions about how to vote.
  • Some charities publish a manifesto in order to publicise the issues which they campaign on, and in particular the changes they are calling for on behalf of their beneficiaries. Again, this is acceptable where the charity is trying to persuade the political parties to adopt the policies which it advocates, or is simply trying to raise the public profile of those issues. It is not acceptable where the intention is to influence voter behaviour. If a charity is approached by a political party for permission to refer to the charity in their manifesto, whether in relation to a political party or generally, the charity must refuse the request. This is because of the risk that the charity will be appearing to endorse the political party itself.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
Back to top Post New Topic