How to remove a metal structure with ease?

Unspecified

2,515

Sister

1,681

#31 [Permalink] Posted on 24th January 2020 12:28

abu mohammed wrote:

View original post

When I read your post I thought to myself only bin Laden could do that.

And..

I still think the same lol.

report post quote code quick quote reply

+1 -0Agree x 1Creative x 1Facepalm x 1

Ø§Ù„Ø¥Ø³Ù„Ø§Ù…Ù ÛŒÙŽØ¹Ù’Ù„ÙÙˆ ÙˆÙŽÙ„ÙŽØ§ ÛŒÙØ¹Ù’Ù„ÛŒÙ°

London

26,183

Brother

9,545

#32 [Permalink] Posted on 24th January 2020 12:30

Guest-49821 wrote:

View original post

I won't be removing this and the other posts as I know why you have posted it and is welcome here :)

(But lets stay on topic)

report post quote code quick quote reply

No post ratings

Actions are judged by intentions, so each man will have what he intended.
ابو محمد

Unspecified

3,243

Brother

2,554

#33 [Permalink] Posted on 24th January 2020 12:30

bint e aisha wrote:

View original post

Then you have misunderstood the whole exercise!

Abu mohammeds point is that Bin Laden didn't do it lol.

report post quote code quick quote reply

+3 -0Winner x 2Creative x 1

xs11ax

London

26,183

Brother

9,545

#34 [Permalink] Posted on 24th January 2020 12:34

bint e aisha wrote:

View original post

On a battle field if he's aided with the help of the unseen, yes, I guess I'd agree.

But you and I both know that this was beyond his capabilities.

This took years of planning.
Required access to the buildings to rig them so they can be pulled down on order, well calculated. Not something a person of no authority can carry out and I mean a landlord, key holders, designers, planners and so on.

Khair, I'll take your post as a joke too. Cartoonish :(

report post quote code quick quote reply

+3 -0Like x 1Creative x 2

Actions are judged by intentions, so each man will have what he intended.
ابو محمد

London

26,183

Brother

9,545

#35 [Permalink] Posted on 24th January 2020 12:42

Halalified YouTube Audio

www.youtube.com/watch?v=TeWYL7OzgsE

@abuzyd2k Dr Zakir Naik (10 minutes for a difficult question) which others reject because they saw it on TV.

Science? Facts? Theories? I would go with Scientific Facts in this case and not Hollywood!

report post quote code quick quote reply

No post ratings

Actions are judged by intentions, so each man will have what he intended.
ابو محمد

Unspecified

2,515

Sister

1,681

#36 [Permalink] Posted on 24th January 2020 12:57

xs11ax wrote:

View original post

I know.

report post quote code quick quote reply

+3 -0Like x 2Agree x 1Informative x 1

Ø§Ù„Ø¥Ø³Ù„Ø§Ù…Ù ÛŒÙŽØ¹Ù’Ù„ÙÙˆ ÙˆÙŽÙ„ÙŽØ§ ÛŒÙØ¹Ù’Ù„ÛŒÙ°

Eraf

1,318

Brother

404

#37 [Permalink] Posted on 24th January 2020 17:27

abu mohammed wrote:

View original post

Dr Zakir Naik is an expert in comparative religious studies and his opinions on those topics are worthy of consideration. He is not qualified to be speaking about 9-11 conspiracy theories.

I went back and looked through a lot of the official report summaries of the fall of the three WTC towers. They seem to satisfactorily address conspiracy theorists' claims.

Publications such as popular mechanics have published series of articles sourced from various experts and investigating agencies.

Are any of us qualified to identify credible original sources for our DYI research on these conspiracy theories?

Do we know what the view of the experts is in these matters?

If there is something we've found to be unusual, have we approached experts with our concerns? Are we basing everything on YouTube videos? Is this how research works?

report post quote code quick quote reply

+3 -0Like x 3Agree x 1Facepalm x 1

Iqra (Read).

Unspecified

3,243

Brother

2,554

#38 [Permalink] Posted on 24th January 2020 17:36

abuzayd2k wrote:

View original post

How do they explain tower 7 which was not hit by a plane?

report post quote code quick quote reply

+1 -0Like x 1Agree x 1

xs11ax

Eraf

1,318

Brother

404

#39 [Permalink] Posted on 24th January 2020 17:48

xs11ax wrote:

View original post

www.popularmechanics.com/military/a6384/debunking-911-myt...

A combination of factors including structural damage due to falling debris from the other towers, fires that burned for many hours, the building's own location and design anomalies, among others.

report post quote code quick quote reply

+3 -0Like x 2Agree x 1Disagree x 1

Iqra (Read).

London

26,183

Brother

9,545

#40 [Permalink] Posted on 24th January 2020 17:50

abuzayd2k wrote:

View original post

The fall of all 3 towers?

In this 58 second clip, the owner is told its in the way and it needs to be pulled. He then orders them to pull it.

youtu.be/-ZlmHvd_RZU

What part of it makes you believe it was a terrorist attack or that bin laden and Co carried it out?

report post quote code quick quote reply

+1 -0Creative x 1

Actions are judged by intentions, so each man will have what he intended.
ابو محمد

London

26,183

Brother

9,545

#41 [Permalink] Posted on 24th January 2020 17:51

abuzayd2k wrote:

View original post

Now that's what I call a conspiracy theory :)

report post quote code quick quote reply

+2 -0Winner x 1Creative x 1

Actions are judged by intentions, so each man will have what he intended.
ابو محمد

Eraf

1,318

Brother

404

#42 [Permalink] Posted on 25th January 2020 01:38

abu mohammed wrote:

View original post

A 58-sec clip from 20 odd years ago supercedes the conclusions of a two-year long investigation by experts in their fields?

report post quote code quick quote reply

+3 -0Like x 3Agree x 1Facepalm x 1

Iqra (Read).

Eraf

1,318

Brother

404

#43 [Permalink] Posted on 25th January 2020 01:44

abu mohammed wrote:

View original post

Popular mechanics peddles conspiracy theories? Do they not care about their credibility?

report post quote code quick quote reply

+3 -0Like x 3Facepalm x 1

Iqra (Read).

London

26,183

Brother

9,545

#44 [Permalink] Posted on 25th January 2020 10:29

abuzayd2k wrote:

View original post

It's as clear as daylight!

WTC7 was ORDERED to be demolished instantly.

A 10 second response from owner of the building was enough to bring it down in a controlled way. 20 years of research cannot deny this fact.

This has been known since the day the it came down.

20 years on, the one known fact still wants to be dismissed to prove something else. Amazing.

Tomorrow if Bush says it was an inside job, you will say the 20 years investigation says otherwise.

Facepalm ðŸ¤¦â€â™‚ï¸

report post quote code quick quote reply

+1 -0Agree x 1Creative x 1

Actions are judged by intentions, so each man will have what he intended.
ابو محمد

6,663

Brother

921

#45 [Permalink] Posted on 25th January 2020 13:26

abuzayd2k wrote:

View original post

And these experts opinions?

What expert opinions do you have?

report post quote code quick quote reply

+2 -0Like x 1Creative x 1

I am not a Mufti

How to remove a metal structure with ease?

Font Size

Font Weight