Forum Menu - Click/Swipe to open
 

2. To which Shaikh of Tasawwuf was Imam Shafi' iee bayt to?

You have contributed 0.0% of this topic

Thread Tools
Appreciate
Topic Appreciation
To appreciate this topic, click 'Appreciate Topic' on the right.
Rank Image
Desi tadka's avatar
Offline
Heavens Thunder is o
829
Brother
66
Desi tadka's avatar
#16 [Permalink] Posted on 10th April 2013 14:41
Quote:
Already done.


I know.

But please don't ask me to prove MY credentials when it comes to tasawwuf.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Desi tadka's avatar
Offline
Heavens Thunder is o
829
Brother
66
Desi tadka's avatar
#17 [Permalink] Posted on 10th April 2013 15:22
Quote:
Already done.


Another thing, actually, didn't you only address why mufti kawthari posted his views on Facebook, I don't think you actually addressed what is being talked about in this thread.

Correct me.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Muadh_Khan's avatar
Offline
UK
11,705
Brother
295
Muadh_Khan's avatar
#18 [Permalink] Posted on 10th April 2013 16:07

"Desi tadka" wrote:
Quote:
Already done.
Another thing, actually, didn't you only address why mufti kawthari posted his views on Facebook, I don't think you actually addressed what is being talked about in this thread. Correct me.

The message has been conveyed to Mufti Ibn Adam (HA).

report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
27,480
Brother
9,579
abu mohammed's avatar
#19 [Permalink] Posted on 11th April 2013 04:09
Interesting topic. Not quite my field yet! InshaAllah will get there soon.

I somewhat agree with Muadh. As in the provocation of the question itself.

Reminds me of Imam Abu Hanifas encounter with the Shia when Imam al-a'dham (rh) told the Shia that the Muslims would take their slippers with them into the Masjid in the prophets time because the Shia would steal them, and then when the Shia replied about the NON-EXISTENCE of the Shia, Imam Abu Hanifa hit him with the label of BIDDAH.

I can see threads like these leading to the same conclusions if one is not careful. If it continues it could cause chaos in my opinion.

I was drifted away from tablighi jamaat by a hardcore hanafi when he asked me similar questions. I since picked up Dharb-e-Mu'min and stuck to that.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Desi tadka's avatar
Offline
Heavens Thunder is o
829
Brother
66
Desi tadka's avatar
#20 [Permalink] Posted on 11th April 2013 10:10

@bro Muadh and abu mohammed, just because I created a thread asking which Imam was bayt to who - you all got frustrated and started talking of provocation and drifting away and what not, and this on an Internet forum...

Imagine what happens when a mufti (and not just referring to mufti kawthari) sitting on a mimbar, through bayans and what not provokes the simple tablighis by saying if Imam Abu Hanifa has done 3 days and 40 days? Reflect on your posts.

This was a small setup, an experiment I did to show you guys - I knew well Hadrath wasn't bayt.

And if a non-Ilmi tablighi asks you back, you call it provocation?

These are double standards which I absolutely hate, and this is what makes the awaam common tablighi move away from the non-tablighi ulamah's.

And tell you what - there isn't a soul (Shaikh or Ulamah) who has the guts and gumption to take up this matter..

What you get called if you respond to this is either a cultist or a fanatic. A good hearted ulamah would only say "Look this is a tarteeb, this wasn't there at the time of the Sahabah [ra] - but has been done by the mashwara of the great elders' - which is what we also hear in tabligh mashwara, ijtema, jor.

Not get told, "Hey! Did your dad such and such things?!'

Drifting away from any effort of Deen is not a loss to the Deen, its a loss to our ownselves. Its just like if somebody accepts or leaves Islam, Islam wont' be a winner or loser.

report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
xs11ax's avatar
Unspecified
3,243
Brother
2,561
xs11ax's avatar
#21 [Permalink] Posted on 11th April 2013 10:54
salaam

i am not having a go at any particular organisation here or any particular service of deen. i am only writing regarding tabligh jamaat because this is the topic and i feel i have some experience regarding it.

the attitude some people have towards tabligh jamaat is because of the attitude of tabligh jamaat itself. i know an alim who resides in batley who used to teach in dewsbury markaz madrasa along with 2 other alims. they all left due to some disagreement they had with the madrasah shura who were trying to make them teach in a certain manner. anyway that alim kind of summed up my own attitude towards tabligh jamaat at the time. he said, ' we are not against tabligh jamaat - tabligh jamaat MAKES us go against them.

this could be one of the reasons why tabligh jamaat are targeted more than some other groups for criticism. the other reason is probably because of the size of their organisation and the way they leave a impression on the muslim community at large both in a good and a bad way.

having said that many of the problems found in tabligh jamaat, mainly the attitude that everyone should yield to their organisation and that their organisation is the highest pinnacle of islam, can be found in every other effort of deen. one person pointed out once that the reason some people have this attitude is because of the love they have for their organisation due to all the time an sacrifice they have put in. this is somewhat understandable but should not be acceptable. this kind of attitude creates enmity and disunity amongst muslims and also stops a person from advancing in the service of deen. one particularly common example is how many people of tabligh have some sort of built in aversion towards those who perform the amal of jihad. i have not just experienced this attitude second hand, but i also had this aversion myself when i used to be a die hard tablighi.

i believe we ALL need to change our attitudes towards the different organisations and services of the deen. we need to unite our efforts where we can progress through the different services of the deen with the concept of 'haal ka amr', i.e whatever the situation demands...and the first stage should be tabligh jamaat wherein a person can instill the love for Allah, His Prophet (saw), His deen, bring the 6 qualities into ones life and learn the basics of islam.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Desi tadka's avatar
Offline
Heavens Thunder is o
829
Brother
66
Desi tadka's avatar
#22 [Permalink] Posted on 11th April 2013 11:10
@xs11ax, let go of it bro, on sf, you have been explained (by bro ahamed shariff) hundreds of times the reason for such actions, sometimes even by me.

Let go if it please.

Regarding this thread, all I want the people to accept is there are mashaiikh and muftis in tabligh too and if one adheres to the usools his tazkiyah can be done without him / her having to go anywhere - not and I have never disrespected the true sufi's, astaghfirulla.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
xs11ax's avatar
Unspecified
3,243
Brother
2,561
xs11ax's avatar
#23 [Permalink] Posted on 11th April 2013 11:33

"Desi tadka" wrote:
@xs11ax, let go of it bro, on sf, you have been explained (by bro ahamed shariff) hundreds of times the reason for such actions, sometimes even by me. Let go if it please.[/quote]

reasons for what actions? reasons for disregarding the other efforts of deen and believing ones own effort to be the only that is needed?

you complain about the attitude others have towards tabligh jamaat, but then the attitude you have is not that much different from the attitudes you are complaining about!

[quote="Desi tadka"]Regarding this thread, all I want the people to accept is there are mashaiikh and muftis in tabligh too and if one adheres to the usools his tazkiyah can be done without him / her having to go anywhere - not and I have never disrespected the true sufi's, astaghfirulla.

but moulana ilyas رضي الله عنه himself did not have this attitude. moulana ilyas رضي الله عنه himself utilised ulama and mashaikh who were not part of tabligh jamaat in order to guide and teach those who were part of tabligh jamaat. even moulana zakariyya رضي الله عنه did not participate in tabligh and was more attached to the khanqah, yet the one book utilised by tabligh jamaat was written by him.

YOU WANT EVERYONE ELSE TO CHANGE THEIR ATTITUDE TOWARDS TABLIGH JAMAAT BUT YOU WANT THE LIBERTY TO HAVE THAT EXACT SAME ATTITUDE TOWARDS EVERY OTHER EFFORT WHICH IS NOT TABLIGH JAMAAT.

report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
xs11ax's avatar
Unspecified
3,243
Brother
2,561
xs11ax's avatar
#24 [Permalink] Posted on 11th April 2013 11:49

"Desi tadka" wrote:
Let go if it please.

if you keep making threads like these about tabligh jamaat on discussion forums then expect people to join in the discussion and add their own opinions and views.

if you do not want to have a discussion, or if you do not like it when people add their own views and opinions, then do not post such things on discussion forums. its as simple as that.

if you just want to give your own views and opinions and do not care to learn from other peoples views and opinions then just post on a blog and disable the comments. problem solved.

report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Desi tadka's avatar
Offline
Heavens Thunder is o
829
Brother
66
Desi tadka's avatar
#25 [Permalink] Posted on 11th April 2013 11:57
xs11ax has a lot of time on his hands....his conjecture regarding tabligh is there for all to see.

bye for now.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
xs11ax's avatar
Unspecified
3,243
Brother
2,561
xs11ax's avatar
#26 [Permalink] Posted on 11th April 2013 12:04

"Desi tadka" wrote:
xs11ax has a lot of time on his hands....his conjecture regarding tabligh is there for all to see. bye for now.

comments like these do not do you any favours at all and is not a good attitude to have. it is akin to a baby throwing out his toys from his cradle.

as for my time, it is upto me how i use it and has nothing to do with you. i can easily make such comments about your time, but do not see how that can benefit this discussion. please refrain from these type of snide comments in the future. jazakallah khair.

report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Muadh_Khan's avatar
Offline
UK
11,705
Brother
295
Muadh_Khan's avatar
#27 [Permalink] Posted on 11th April 2013 12:10

"Desi tadka" wrote:
xs11ax has a lot of time on his hands....his conjecture regarding tabligh is there for all to see. bye for now.

Asslamo Allaikum,

I have known him personally for over 10 years but lets imagine what you are saying is correct and he has an Agenda regarding Tableegh and wants to bring it down.

Lets also assume that Mufti Ibn Adam (HA) also has an Agenda against Tableegh?

Then isn't this exactly what you are doing about Tassawuff?

How does their wrong make it right for you? At which point do you stop and look at the noble character of Sayyidina Rasul-ullah (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) for guidence? Isn't this just tit-for-tat debate with no outcome?

report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Like x 1
back to top
Rank Image
Desi tadka's avatar
Offline
Heavens Thunder is o
829
Brother
66
Desi tadka's avatar
#28 [Permalink] Posted on 11th April 2013 12:53

"Muadh_Khan" wrote:

"Desi tadka" wrote:
xs11ax has a lot of time on his hands....his conjecture regarding tabligh is there for all to see. bye for now.

Asslamo Allaikum,

I have known him personally for over 10 years but lets imagine what you are saying is correct and he has an Agenda regarding Tableegh and wants to bring it down.

Lets also assume that Mufti Ibn Adam (HA) also has an Agenda against Tableegh?

Then isn't this exactly what you are doing about Tassawuff?

How does their wrong make it right for you? At which point do you stop and look at the noble character of Sayyidina Rasul-ullah (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) for guidence? Isn't this just tit-for-tat debate with no outcome?

Wa alay kum as salaam,

I have explained quite clearly the reason for doing so. And there is no need I feel to expound on this further. 

If you think this was against tasawwuf (for the nth time, like others), then let it be so, 'coz I can't break it down further.

So this too was against tasaawuf? Wow.

report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Muadh_Khan's avatar
Offline
UK
11,705
Brother
295
Muadh_Khan's avatar
#29 [Permalink] Posted on 11th April 2013 13:09

"Desi tadka" wrote:

"Muadh_Khan" wrote:

"Desi tadka" wrote:
xs11ax has a lot of time on his hands....his conjecture regarding tabligh is there for all to see. bye for now.

Asslamo Allaikum,

I have known him personally for over 10 years but lets imagine what you are saying is correct and he has an Agenda regarding Tableegh and wants to bring it down.

Lets also assume that Mufti Ibn Adam (HA) also has an Agenda against Tableegh?

Then isn't this exactly what you are doing about Tassawuff?

How does their wrong make it right for you? At which point do you stop and look at the noble character of Sayyidina Rasul-ullah (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) for guidence? Isn't this just tit-for-tat debate with no outcome?

Wa alay kum as salaam,

I have explained quite clearly the reason for doing so. And there is no need I feel to expound on this further. 

If you think this was against tasawwuf (for the nth time, like others), then let it be so, 'coz I can't break it down further.

So this too was against tasaawuf? Wow.

You know when there is Turf wars between 2 gangs people on both sides die and innocent people suffer.

People involved in Tassawuff have a seriously arrogant attitude and they think that they are better then everyone else (despite what Tassawuff is supposed to mean) and we can't change that and they won't even listen to us lowly people because:

  1. We are beneath them
  2. We are not their Shaykhs and Islah can only be done by their Shaykh

The purpose of Tableegh is to invite people towards Allah (SWT) & Sayyidina Rasul-ullah (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) and if the pride of a Tableeghi gets hurt in the process then so be it but his/her Aakhira will be made.  Shaykh (Maulana) Ilyas Kandhalwi (RA) said that even if you have to grab the feet of a Muslim to ask them to come to the Sunnah then do it!

There are plenty of Non-Deobandees taregtting Ulamah of Deobandees, their methodology and their work so we don't need Tassawuff vs Tableegh feud amongst ourselves.

If the Sufees can't give it up then for the pleasure of Allah (SWT) you should give it up!

Jazakullah Khairun

report post quote code quick quote reply
+3 -0Like x 3
back to top
Rank Image
afriki_haqq's avatar
Unspecified
418
Brother
201
afriki_haqq's avatar
#30 [Permalink] Posted on 12th April 2013 08:38
Assalaamu 'Alaykum

I echo the sentiments above. This is the attitude that has led to the "decline" of Deobandism, particularly in the West. I know of many who come from strong Deobandi (Tablighi and/or Sufi) families and upbringing who want nothing to do with it and would rather flock around Al-Kauthar/Al-Maghrib or scholars like Mufti Menk, Nu'man Ali Khan, etc.

The differences amongst Deobandis has always been and I don't need to write about it as it has been written in much detail already in books, forums, blogs, etc. Until we only claim to follow the akabirin and do not actually, practically follow them in day-to-day situations then these kinds of TJ-Sufi bickering will continue. Let us take an example from the akabirin and move on in our fields, whichever it may be.

As it is the Deobandis as a whole are facing an onslaught from the outside. We don't need these internal issues. This legacy that we are creating, the akabirin would NEVER associate with it; they would NOT even recognise it as being on the maslak of Deoband.

Wallahu 'alam
report post quote code quick quote reply
+2 -0Like x 2
back to top