Forum Menu - Click/Swipe to open
 

Comprehensive Pakistan Thread

Jump to page:

You have contributed 0.0% of this topic

Thread Tools
Appreciate
Topic Appreciation
abuzayd2k, bint e aisha, Abdur Rahman ibn Awf, sipraomer, tanveerzakee, sharjan8643
Rank Image
Offline
MARS
2,170
Brother
338
#706 [Permalink] Posted on 10th November 2019 00:12
Khitab E Jummah 08.11.2019 || By Khalid Mehmood Abbasi

1. When a nation is disobedient to Allah, Allah lifts fiqr (fear of Allah) from it's heart.
2. This is the sign of his adhaab when despite of disobedience people are afraid no more for their disaster and destruction.
3. Such a nation is made slave and her economy is shattered as a sign of anger of Allah. Her talents and asbaab are wasted. No barakah remains in that nation's resources and capabilities.
4. Allah inspires the leaders and intellectuals of that nation to mislead their followers.
5. Then Allah gives them wealth as punishment and people become joyous and happy and believe that good and bad days come and go. They don't pay attention on their disobedience and remain busy in the life of pomp, fasaad, disobedience and sin.
6. Then Allah punishes that nation with destruction and death in the blink of an eye.

When Allah decides to help the mazloomeen. He gives them a leader like Sayyidina Musa AS.

1. That leader is confident and looks eye to eye to the Pharaoh of his times.
2. He trust in Allah and faces obstacles and sanctions from the whole world.
3. He remains steadfast.
4. Allah helps momineen with the ability to convey the truth with sound evidence and strong reasoning.
5. Finally, Allah grants victory to the righteous ones.

So in a nutshell, zalimoon are punished by Allah and mazloomeen are helped by Allah. Zalimoon's leaders and intellectuals are misled resulting in misleading of the masses. Mazloomeen are granted great leaders who train them to be obedient and Allah helps the obedient ones.

Point to ponder. Where are we standing? In which group we will be counted? What is the condition of our character and our amaal? Will we be destroyed or will we be helping that righteous leader who will be granted to us by Allah as a mercy? Are we the mazloomeen (the righteous victims) or the zalimoon (the transgressors)?
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Like x 1
back to top
Rank Image
Rajab's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
1,857
Brother
913
Rajab's avatar
#707 [Permalink] Posted on 10th November 2019 12:47
Maulana manzoor mengal did a speech today at Azadi march. JUI-F probably lost few supporters today.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
mSiddiqui's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
538
Brother
96
mSiddiqui's avatar
#708 [Permalink] Posted on 10th November 2019 14:32
Rajab wrote:
View original post

Are you trying be sarcastic with the last sentence?
Blocked from replying in this thread.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
MARS
2,170
Brother
338
#709 [Permalink] Posted on 10th November 2019 14:38
This must not happen. Prominent and senior ulema must not support this dharna. Not good. Not good. Not good.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
mSiddiqui's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
538
Brother
96
mSiddiqui's avatar
#710 [Permalink] Posted on 10th November 2019 14:58
sipraomer wrote:
View original post

Dr. Abdur Razzaq Iskandari also supports this. A lot of Ulama from Binori Town are there. One of Hazrat Shaikhs Khalifa also holds daily Zikr Majlis there.
Blocked from replying in this thread.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Rajab's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
1,857
Brother
913
Rajab's avatar
#711 [Permalink] Posted on 10th November 2019 15:10
mSiddiqui wrote:
View original post

His crass language is not suitable for a such large gathering which is viewed by every section of the society. His language might be humorous for his students in the class but certainly not here.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+0 -0Agree x 1
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
MARS
2,170
Brother
338
#712 [Permalink] Posted on 10th November 2019 15:23
mSiddiqui wrote:
View original post


This is dangerous and disastrous. What are these senior ulema thinking? Can't they see the obvious? Are they ready to fight with the establishment?
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
mSiddiqui's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
538
Brother
96
mSiddiqui's avatar
#713 [Permalink] Posted on 10th November 2019 15:33
sipraomer wrote:
View original post

Short answer: Yes
Blocked from replying in this thread.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Muadh_Khan's avatar
Offline
UK
11,537
Brother
112
Muadh_Khan's avatar
#714 [Permalink] Posted on 10th November 2019 16:03

Maripat wrote:
View original post

Done.

Mufti Tariq Saheb is not aware of any of the details about Ulama in India, he is just praising Maulana Kaleem Saheb (HA) on what he hears.

I have conveyed your message to him (as best I can formulate it) without getting involved in backbiting, slander and accusations, just asked him to be careful and made him understand that stuff may come to bite him in the future. He is unaware but we are dealing with emotional people who can twist matters.


report post quote code quick quote reply
+2 -0Like x 2
back to top
Rank Image
Muadh_Khan's avatar
Offline
UK
11,537
Brother
112
Muadh_Khan's avatar
#715 [Permalink] Posted on 10th November 2019 17:28
This post has been reported. It could be due to breaking rules or something as simple as bad use of bbcodes which breaks the page format. We will attend to this soon.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
1,210
Brother
121
#716 [Permalink] Posted on 10th November 2019 21:49
The Ummah is falling apart.

May Allah guide us all.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+0 -0Ameen x 1
back to top
Rank Image
Maripat's avatar
Offline
Gham-o-Huzn
3,269
Brother
3,503
Maripat's avatar
#717 [Permalink] Posted on 11th November 2019 05:17
To avoid the bots I shall discuss the Babri Masjid decision in this thread.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Offline
Unspecified
57
Brother
30
#718 [Permalink] Posted on 11th November 2019 07:09
Really today's fit-nah is confusing us , cant judge who is right or who is wrong.

one side we have JUI Ulamaa / Muftis , other side we have good heart person (IK) .

The way these JUI Ulamaa / Muftis giving speeches, i am afraid to hear they mock / they abuse others .

May ALLAH keep us united in right path ameen.

report post quote code quick quote reply
+0 -0Ameen x 1
back to top
Rank Image
Maripat's avatar
Offline
Gham-o-Huzn
3,269
Brother
3,503
Maripat's avatar
#719 [Permalink] Posted on 11th November 2019 07:44
Indian Supreme Court Rules for Ram Temple at Babri Masjid Site


1. Supreme Court has granted the entire 2.77 acre of disputed land in Ayodhya to deity Ram Lalla.

2. Supreme Court has directed the Centre and Uttar Pradesh government to allot an alternative 5 acre land to the Muslims at a prominent place to build a mosque.

3. The court has asked Centre to consider granting some kind of representation to Nirmohi Akhara in setting up of trust. Nirmohi Akhara was the third party in the Ayodhya dispute.

4. The Supreme Court dismissed the plea of Nirmohi Akhara, which was seeking control of the entire disputed land, saying they are the custodian of the land.

5. Supreme Court has directed the Union government to set up a trust in 3 months for the construction of the Ram mandir at the disputed site where Babri Masjid was demolished in 1992.

6. The Supreme Court said the underlying structure below the disputed site at Ayodhya was not an Islamic structure, but the ASI has not established whether a temple was demolished to build a mosque.

7. The court also said that the Hindus consider the disputed site as the birthplace of Lord Ram while the Muslims also say the same about the Babri Masjid site.

8. The court also said that the faith of the Hindus that Lord Ram was born at the disputed site where the Babri Masjid once stood cannot be disputed.

9. The Supreme Court also said that the 1992 demolition of the 16th century Babri Masjid mosque was a violation of law.

10. While reading out its judgment, the Supreme Court said that the UP Sunni Central Waqf Board has failed to establish its case in Ayodhya dispute case and Hindus have established their case that they were in possession of outer courtyard of the disputed site.

Link : India Today
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Maripat's avatar
Offline
Gham-o-Huzn
3,269
Brother
3,503
Maripat's avatar
#720 [Permalink] Posted on 11th November 2019 07:51
The Hindu Editorial Today


The Hindu, the English language national daily newspaper from Chennai in south India is a left oriented publication and usually takes a secular approach to events but in case of the Babri Masjid verdict delivered on November 10 by the Supreme Court of India the editorial in this newspaper gave a very Saffron friendly title.

Quote:

In paving the way for a Ram temple in Ayodhya, the Supreme Court prioritised communal harmony over all else


The whole Saffron milieu is resonating similar sentiments.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0
back to top

Jump to page: