Forum Menu - Click/Swipe to open
 

OPINION ABOUT MAUDUDI SAHEB

Jump to page:

You have contributed 19.1% of this topic

Thread Tools
Appreciate
Topic Appreciation
To appreciate this topic, click 'Appreciate Topic' on the right.
#106 [Permalink] Posted on 27th August 2015 06:31
Every true muslim's blood boils when he sees the tabarrah majalis by shias on youtube. But in prevailing conditions we have to offer sacrifices and be cool. The reason; today the enemies of Islam are waiting for an opportunity to use the division among the ummah.

And especially in Pakistan, the first priority is to bring peace in the country. In the chaotic conditions every one has gone mad, no one knows why is he killing and victim doesn't know why he got killed.

First priority; remove chaos and bring peace and order. Other things can have lower priority.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+0 -0Winner x 1
back to top
Rank Image
muhammad ilyas's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
1
Brother
0
muhammad ilyas's avatar
#107 [Permalink] Posted on 27th August 2015 15:46
Muadh_Khan wrote:
View original post

he is Jahil And bad deen and gumraah
report post quote code quick quote reply
+0 -0Agree x 1
back to top
Rank Image
Moderator's avatar
Moderator's avatar
#108 [Permalink] Posted on 27th August 2015 15:50
Please maintain respect for the 'Ulama and your fellow muslims by avoiding accusations and slanderous comments. Also remember that in order for criticism to be constructive, it must be channeled in the right direction. If there is any doubt in a matter, it is better to remain silent than to speak ill of another person.
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
#109 [Permalink] Posted on 27th August 2015 17:51
May Allah protect the ummah.

More a person abuses or accuses other persons, it is a fashion now to call the person of higher taqwah. Subhanallah!!

As the list of people taken to task grows, the taqwah is assumed to be higher, our hadhrath won't tolerate.

Maudoodi sahib, sir syed ahamed khan, then peer Zulfiqar sahib, molana saad sahib, junaid jamshed, hashim amla, moulana tariq jameel sahib.... as the list grows, it is assumed that the taqwah grows. Subhanallah.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+0 -0Dislike x 3Disagree x 2Creative x 1
back to top
Rank Image
Unspecified
742
Brother
499
#110 [Permalink] Posted on 27th August 2015 20:56
Moudoodi sahib was not "All bad", He was not "All good" either...

Like many other scholars those who like him exaggerate his qualities...and those who don't like him highlight his mistakes. He was neither an angel nor a devil. His service are to be appreciated where he writes against the western civilisation and where he exposes the evil face of materialism...I wish he had restricted his efforts only to this task. He failed where he started acting like a Faqeeh and started giving comments on the subjects he simply did not know and therefore committed blunders. The uluma had to check him there and then....it was their duty !

One important trait of his writings was a very casual way of addressing the AKABIR of Din including Sahaba...and uluma/Mashaikh. It is obvious that when one gets used to treat Mashaikh & uluma with disrespect, after sometimes he starts taking even Sahaba lightly...and the next level is that of the prophets (may Allah save us all).

Mounoodi sahib was a victim of his writing style. In his Tafseer he has almost always spoken very high of the Prophets and Sahaba EXCEPT two or three places where he was carried away... But even once is not good :(

In any case his services to Din are overwhelming. Unfortunately most of his critics have not read him thoroughly otherwise they might have found many good things in him too ! Wallaho Alam
report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0
back to top
Rank Image
Rajab's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
738
Brother
356
Rajab's avatar
#111 [Permalink] Posted on 27th August 2015 23:01
ALIF wrote:
View original post

Hes critics may not have read his work because they are discouraged from reading Maududi's work because apparsntley its a sweet poison
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
Abdullah1's avatar
Unspecified
532
Brother
318
Abdullah1's avatar
#112 [Permalink] Posted on 28th August 2015 02:12

ALIF wrote:
View original post

A single urine drop in a bucket full of pure clean milk.

All spoiled.

No one will use it.

report post quote code quick quote reply
+1 -0Like x 1Agree x 2
back to top
Rank Image
Unspecified
742
Brother
499
#113 [Permalink] Posted on 28th August 2015 04:40
Sorry about typing the name MOUNOODI instead of Moudoodi.
It was an unintentional typing mistake
I apologise !
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
gatekeeper 's avatar
Offline
Unspecified
93
Brother
28
gatekeeper 's avatar
#114 [Permalink] Posted on 9th September 2015 17:00
Maududism is more foul and deviant than the rejection of taqlid. Look at the books of Maududi. He not only encourages dislike for Imam Abu Hanifah and the imams and jurists (fuqaha). Rather, he also dishonours the Noble Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) and the great khalifahs. Venom is spurted out regarding the imams of Hadith and the noble mujtahids. If a teacher is of this view, then what type of poison will be given to students—evaluate this yourself. The person who speaks absurd things in relation to Imam Abu al-Hasan Ash‘ari, Imam Ghazali, Mujaddid Alf-i-Thani, Shah Waliullah, Shah ‘Abd al-‘Aziz, Khwaja Mu‘in al-Din Chishti et al and whose writings are full of this, then the teacher who considers him correct, what sort of deviance and error will he be the cause of amid students. Evaluate this yourself.

Because of this, we only say that those who follow this track should definitely not be in an institute. Students or teachers should not look at the books of Maududi—assess this yourself. We have observed such that if someone, despite being of the same track, was either lacking in pious actions (be-‘amal) or whose actions were bad (bad-‘amal), then such a person would be of great harm in the administration of education.

I consider the action of Haji Qa’im al-Din to be correct. If Molwi ‘Abd al-Halim Sahib is of the same view as the Maududis and is in support of them, and he has established this view having read his books etc. then he should definitely be excluded from the institute. What takes place in future is your choice. The announcement we have made regarding the Maududis has been done with thought and understanding having taken into consideration his books and actions and having witnessed his impact. That which has not been written so far and not been published yet is much more. His books are full of deviancy. Be vigilant, be vigilant. Wassalam.

Nang-i-Aslaf
Hussayn Ahmad (may he be forgiven)
Deoband

(Maktubat bi-Silsilah Mawdudi Jama‘at, letter 14, page 101, and also Maktubat-Shaykh al-Islam, letter 14, volume 3, page 89)

Something that i read
report post quote code quick quote reply
+3 -0Like x 1Winner x 1
back to top
#115 [Permalink] Posted on 10th September 2015 17:34
There is a saying "If a deviant teaches quran to our children he shall spoil their Imaan"

But prevailing situation in Indian sub-continent demands that we shall have good relation with every group here including JI. We can disagree with them but don't hate them and spread hatred against them. Strong message shall go that we disagree with Maudoodi sahib.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+0 -0
back to top
#116 [Permalink] Posted on 10th September 2015 17:40
Other day we went to meet muslim brothers in a locality in gashth. A group of people were sitting in one business establishment. The group said "Only Kaafirs are here" and we left without talking to them. The guide (rahbar said), they are JI followers and the local ulema are very vocal in calling them kaafirs.

My heart said "Yaa Allah!!!!"
report post quote code quick quote reply
No post ratings
back to top
Rank Image
abu mohammed's avatar
London
20,794
Brother
6,915
abu mohammed's avatar
#117 [Permalink] Posted on 11th September 2015 08:57
Guest-286371 wrote:
View original post

When a Muslim calls another Muslim a Kaafir, and the accusation is incorrect, then the label of Kufr is upon themselves. But these fools in the so-called establishment made Takfeer on themselves.... Unbelievable attitude. Such arrogance and pride, both qualities that don't fit mankind
report post quote code quick quote reply
+0 -0Agree x 2
back to top
#118 [Permalink] Posted on 18th August 2016 19:51
abu sawda wrote:
View original post

I just checked this point about Abdullah bin Masood at the online English translation of tafheemul Quran. The above attribution to maududi is the exact opposite of what he says. I quote from part of the discussion:
Quote:
But wicked indeed would be the person who went beyond describing a wrong act as wrong and started reproving and finding fault with the Companions of the Holy Prophet of Allah. Concerning the Mu'awwidhatayn the commentators and traditionists have described the opinion of Ibn Mas'ud as wrong, but no one has dared to say that by denying these two Surahs of the Qur'an, he had, God forbid, become a disbeliever.


That's a pretty serious misquote! So I felt compelled to reply to correct it. Alas, it is still there on the first page and my reply is on the last page :( in the future we should be much more careful, as a scholar one has an obligation to cross reference factual transmissions from our teachers as well.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+0 -0
back to top
#119 [Permalink] Posted on 19th August 2016 17:43
I had been interacting with elite among Jamaat-e-Islami. The Naazims, Naazim-e-A'ala etc.

Their behavior towards sahabah, tabaieen the muhadditeen etc. is not as per the aadaab of what we are taught by cultured ulema.

Diluting salah, saum, haj/umera etc. as optional military training and killing the rooh of these aamaal.

Surely the products reflect the mindset of Molana Maududi Sahib RA.
report post quote code quick quote reply
+0 -0
back to top
#120 [Permalink] Posted on 20th August 2016 07:13
I was reading a book by Molana Maududi RA. He writes.
1. He has the right to criticize anyone other than prophet SAS. Because only Prophet is masoom.
2. Even if an hadith is saheeh in its sanad, he would weigh it logically, if his mind accepts he takes it. Only Quran is above this.
3. First two Khulfa could do real service to deen; later two khulfa had limitations. And after that, real Islam was missing in rulers.
3. "No real Mujaddid is born in history". He has discussed about personalities; Hazrat Umar bin Abdul Azeez RA, Aimmah Arbah, Imam Ghazali RA, Shah waliullah RA, Imam Timiyah RA, Molana Sirhindi RA etc. He presents good research about qualities of these personalities and then, at the end he drops a bomb shell, Molana in few words, find faults or presents their limitations and proves that they were not mujaddid.
4. Molana says that qualities of Imam Mahdi discussed in ahadith are illogical. (After reading qualities Molana has discussed about imam Mahdi, My view is that Molana was expecting Imam Mahdi to be a graduate from Defence Academy).
5. Teachings of Tasawwuf and stress on ibadah was state sponsored by rulers to stop people from demanding justice or correcting rulers. And rulers can rule freely.



report post quote code quick quote reply
+0 -0
back to top

Jump to page:

 

Quick Reply

CAPTCHA - As you are a guest, you are required to answer the following:


In the above image: What's behind the word Yellow? (it's not the sun)