You have contributed 19.6% of this topic
Here is a summarised version of what I am trying to say:
Differences of opinion are a hallmark of tolerance of Islam. Salaf and our Akaabir differed (in Fiqh let alone politics) and lived with each other.
The uncle/nephew duo are slugging it in Indian Courts. There are disputes over finances, disputes over areas of collection, differences (upon claiming credit) for charity.
I know your Silsila and what this dispute entails closely and intimately. I am not in a place to lay blame and claim that Chacha or Bhateeja is at fault, let them BOTH take a mockery of Indian Muslims run with their money and fight it in Indian court and degrade Islam!
The references which you have quoted no doubt teach tolerance (and we all agree with it). The Chacha/Bhateeja (Uncle/Nephew) war is anything but Tolerance.
Don’t think we were born yesterday. :P
Disagreement is Mubah in Islam and one can agree to disagree. Using one's (supposed) position in Islam to Bully/Insult people (instead of discussion) is not.
Me & You disagree (often) and its a pleasure. Others in this thread have not read what they are disagreeing about the Hazrat Shaykh (DB) doesn't even have the ability to read (as per his own admission). He claims that his teacher caught Maulana smoking so fair enough.
The other "Mureed" is trying to say that Chacha/Bhateeja (uncle/Nephew) Madani dispute is coridal which is insulting to everyone who knows the reality. He gives references to respecting differences of opinion and then quotes Madani dispute :P
All it is INSULT upon INSULT; or falsifying of facts there is no argument to speak of.
Take a look at the one who is "Disliking" the posts of GateKeeper who is simply quoting Maulana Masihullah Khan (RA) :P Would you call it an argument? :)
Allah (SWT) knows best.
This cannot be undone and I am sure it will be greatly appreciated.